by Mike Masnick
Thu, Mar 15th 2012 8:37am
There is something symbolic about the news that the Encyclopaedia Britannica is finally giving up on its printed product -- a product that was once more or less "required" for middle class families. Of course, if you'd asked me last week if Britannica actually still printed its books, I might have guessed they'd already stopped. Britannica had lost an awful lot of relevance even before Wikipedia came along, and its efforts to embrace the web have always come across as too little, too late in an era dominated by Wikipedia. While the ending of the print publication is a milestone, it seems unlikely to be an indication of fortunes turning around for Britannica.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- WSJ Writer: All The Failings Of Print Journalism Are The Fault Of The Internet
- Why Do People Trust Wikipedia? Because An Argument Is Better Than A Lecture
- Don't Weep For The Past; Plan For The Future
- Group Of Major PR Firms Pledge To Play Nice On Wikipedia
- Excuse Me, Could I Interest You In A Thousand-Volume Set Of Encyclopedias?