by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 27th 2011 2:30pm
As we recently noted in our coverage of the various attempts to amend the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), with some plans to make it worse, there was one bright spot: Senators Grassley and Franken had introduced an amendment that would make it clear that merely violating a website's terms of service did not constitute exceeding authorized access, as some law enforcement (and courts) had interpreted the law to read. Thankfully, this amendment was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. That's no guarantee that it will become a part of the law -- and there's no guarantee that other changes might not make the CFAA even worse, but it's at least a step in the right direction. It's good to finally see Congress at least push back on the expansive interpretation of the CFAA that law enforcement has been using for too long.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Twitter Reports On Government Agencies Using 'Report Tweet' Function To Block Terrorism-Related Content
- Russian Bank Sends Legal Threats To Researcher Who Revealed Spike In Traffic Supposedly Tied To Trump's Server
- Congressman Introduces Bill That Would Allow People And Companies To 'Hack Back' After Attacks
- Did A Former National Parks Employee Violate The CFAA By Tweeting About Climate Change?
- How The DMCA And The CFAA Are Preventing People From Saving Their Soon-To-Be-Broken Pebble Watches