by Mike Masnick
Tue, Sep 27th 2011 2:30pm
As we recently noted in our coverage of the various attempts to amend the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), with some plans to make it worse, there was one bright spot: Senators Grassley and Franken had introduced an amendment that would make it clear that merely violating a website's terms of service did not constitute exceeding authorized access, as some law enforcement (and courts) had interpreted the law to read. Thankfully, this amendment was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. That's no guarantee that it will become a part of the law -- and there's no guarantee that other changes might not make the CFAA even worse, but it's at least a step in the right direction. It's good to finally see Congress at least push back on the expansive interpretation of the CFAA that law enforcement has been using for too long.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Court Says Lauri Love Can Be Extradited To Face Hacking Charges In The US
- DOJ To Researchers: First Amendment Does Not Protect Violating Websites' Terms Of Services
- Thanks, Google, For Fucking Over A Bunch Of Media Websites
- EFF, ACLU Asks Ninth Circuit Court To Rehear Two Recent CFAA Cases
- Disappointing: LinkedIn Abusing CFAA & DMCA To Sue Scraping Bots