by Mike Masnick
Mon, Aug 29th 2011 3:11pm
Consumerist points us to the news that a guy named Samuel D. Jackson (not L.) has initiated a class action lawsuit against Infotrack, a background check company, because it claimed that he was a sex offender. The only problem? Infotrack got confused over its Samuel Jacksons, and didn't bother to do much to disambiguate them. That the guy they called a "sex offender" was only four years old at the time of the supposed "crime" apparently didn't set off any alarm bells at Infotrack. In fact, Jackson claims that the company told him this kind of thing happens often enough in cases where people have "common names." In this case, Infotrack didn't even check middle names, as the actual offender is named Samuel L. Jackson... though is not the famous Samuel L. Jackson. Thankfully, however, it appears that movie studios didn't rely on the same background checks in determining whether or not to employ the actor, or the class action lawsuit might have become even more entertaining.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Sony Pictures, Which Hyped Up 'Harm' Of Hack, Now Tells Court No Harm Done To Employees
- Judge Not At All Impressed By Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Yelp Reviewers Are Really Employees
- Dueling Lawsuits Threaten The NFL, DirecTV's Annoying Sunday Ticket Exclusive
- Warner Bros. And Rightscorp Argue That Copyright Trolling Is Protected By The First Amendment
- Class Action Lawsuit Over Apple DRM Stumbles Because Plaintiffs Aren't Actually In The Class