by Mike Masnick
Mon, Mar 21st 2011 4:32am
While plenty of attention late last week was focused (reasonably) on the goings on in Libya and Japan, there was a Wikileaks story that also was important. As Slashdot notes, a recent Wikileaks cable leak reveals claims of rampant bribery in the Indian parliament, specifically with regards to a controversial nuclear deal with the US. The report, from a State Department official, involves him reporting that he was shown "chests of cash" potentially representing $25 million, which was going to be used to pay off members of Parliament to vote for the deal. Of course, the response has been a whole lot of denial, so it should be interesting to watch what comes next. However, given how often we hear that the Wikileaks documents weren't any kind of whistleblowing or hadn't revealed anything major, I'm curious how people can still claim that, given this latest leak.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Two Overlooked Aspects Of Those Leaks About NSA Spying On French Presidents
- The Ridiculous Redactions The DOJ Required To Try To Hide The Details Of Its Google Gag Order
- Google Was Gagged For Four Years From Talking About Fighting The Wikileaks Investigation
- Wikileaks Reveals NSA Spying On French Presidents