Man Trademarks 'Welcome To Parry Sound,' Demands Money From Parry Sound Organizations

from the ah,-trademark-law dept

You may have noticed that as the field of "intellectual property law" has been getting more and more attention, those who benefit the most from it have done an effective, if misleading, job of convincing people that copyright, patents and trademark are "just like property." That's not true of course, and it's especially misleading when it comes to trademark law, which is designed to prevent consumer confusion, not to provide incentives, like copyright or patent law. But, all too frequently, we see people think that if they can somehow get a registered trademark on a term, it means they can prevent others from using it. Perhaps the most famous case was that of Leo Stoller who got trademarks on a variety of words, such as "stealth," and then started demanding everyone who used those words pay up.

It appears that Stoller is not alone in this game, and this latest example may have taken a misinterpretation of trademark law to another level altogether. Reader Project P1 points us to the news that a guy named Nick Slater was somehow able to secure a trademark on the term "Welcome to Parry Sound." Parry Sound, of course, is a small town in Ontario. Now that Slater has the trademark, he's been invoicing lots of organizations for daring to use the phrase "welcome to Parry Sound," in any way. Thankfully, the various lawyers of those invoiced have all said, clearly, that there's no trademark issue here and not to pay, but Slater isn't giving up. Town residents have been protesting by putting up "Welcome to Parry Sound" signs on their lawn, and one guy set up a "Welcome to Parry Sound" Facebook group.

Slater's response? He sent that guy an invoice as well... and then filed a takedown claim with Facebook which blindly complied.

There is no legitimate trademark claim here, but once again, we're seeing what the concept of "intellectual property" is creating, with people thinking they can own basic things like a town greeting.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 11:25am

    I hope this becomes a trend. For things to get better sometimes they need to get worse first. Right now only the techie and content types are being affected by this. If everyone knew someone who was affected by this maybe we could get Patents and copyright back inline with what they are supposed to do "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 11:36am

    You're violating my copyrights

    On vowels.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Cha Ching, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 11:51am

    Going to be rich!

    I am going add the phrase "Welcome to" to every location on earth, trademark it and sue every living person using it! Brilliant!

    Welcome to Ohio - Cha Ching!
    Welcome to San Francisco - Cha Ching!
    Welcome to Siberia - Cha Ching!

    I hope nobody realizes places of the world have an established date (ie Parry Sound of 1857) prior to my trademarks thus nullifying my lawsuit. Not like there are maps, guidebooks, amusement parks, etc that have used "Welcome to " for decades prior to this. But I am sure nobody will have thought to look that deep into it.

    *stares like a deer in the headlights*

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Thomas (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 11:57am

    Welcome to Ownership Culture™

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    cc (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 12:08pm

    This guy is either a very stupid IP troll, or a very brilliant anti-IP troll. Can't tell which.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 12:12pm

    (Devil's Advocate)

    And yet, there are good things which have come out of the whole 'intellectual property' craze. For example, due to restrictive licensing on the 'glottal stop' that particular sound is almost entirely absent in all modern languages.

    ; P

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Bubba Gump (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 12:32pm

    Re: You're violating my copyrights

    BTW, I just got the trademark on "Anonymous Coward".

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 12:57pm

    Re: Going to be rich!

    Actually start a clothing line called "Welcome Two" its close enough. And if Monster Cable can go after all the people it goes after. You can certainly agressively defend your trademark also. :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 1:00pm


    "This guy is either a very stupid IP troll, or a very brilliant anti-IP troll. Can't tell which."

    Since "he’s an engineer" I would say anti-IP troll. I could be wrong but he did give me a great idea.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Danny, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 2:02pm

    Poor Moron In A Hurry

    The poor moron can't tell the differnce between a trademark hoarder and an entire f'n town. Maybe the moron should slow down a little..

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 8:50pm


    >...a guy named Nick Slater was somehow able to secure a >trademark on the term "Welcome to Parry Sound".

    If you took the time to understand the Canadian trade mark process, you would understand why the mark went through to registration. Canadian trade mark law does not allow Examiners to deny registration on the basis of non-distinctiveness. The mark in question is in no way "clearly descriptive" of the goods or services associated with the application, so the mark proceeded to advertisement. The public at large had 2 months within which to file an opposition to the registration of this mark. It most definitely would have fallen in the opposition process, but nobody bothered to oppose the mark. The only way to get rid of this guy now is through the Federal Court...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    TtfnJohn (profile), Aug 26th, 2010 @ 1:21pm

    Re: Registrability

    I'm betting there'll be a case in Federal Court any day now.

    And, I'm thinking that after that we'll be told by the Tories (and the Grits) that we have to do things this way because of our international obligations under ACTA, which isn't finished and hasn't seen the light of day in the Commons yet.

    Gawd, we're such a stupid country sometimes!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Daryl McMurray, Sep 2nd, 2010 @ 4:31pm

    Re: Registrability

    I believe you are correct about this falling in opposition, and yes, it was published for the required amount of time. The problem is that opposing it would have required someone to have conceived that slater would attempt to register such a mark - and be regularly scanning the trade-mark journal (The only place it's published) in order to have caught it during the required time frame. Being from Parry Sound, I can assure you that we are wanting nothing more then for Slater to actually attempt to take this to federal court. So far... He's chickened out. Slater has not even tried to sue anyone for Trade-Mark infringement - Instead, he sent out invoices ($1000 per usage per year, as a non solicited Trade-Mark licencing fee - if you can believe that!) , and then attempted to sue in small claims court for non payment of the invoices.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    JoeFLash, Nov 9th, 2010 @ 5:36am


    Welcome to Parry Sound(Ca Ching) Welcome to St. Matthews United Church Belleville(Ca Ching) Words off wisdom from Nick of It's a Wonderful life ringing his Cash Register... GET THIS GUYS...I'M GIVING OUT FREE WINGS!!! What a Farce from Local Idiot Nick Slater!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Randy Higgins, Mar 14th, 2012 @ 6:51am

    Still invoicing

    Two years later I am still getting invoiced for my Welcome to Parry Sound facebook group. Non-commercial use of a trademark is NOT infringement. The trademarks act supports this.
    Courts have found that non-misleading use of trademarks in URLs and domain names of critical websites is fair. Companies can get particularly annoyed about these uses because they may make your post appear in search results relating to the company, but that doesn't give them a right to stop you.Anyone can sell diesel fuel even though one company has trademarked DIESEL for jeans. Only holders of "famous" trademarks, like CocaCola, can stop use in all categories, but even they can't block non-commercial uses of their marks.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Advertisement - Amazon Prime Music
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.