Copyright

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
copyright, dmca, michael jackson, safe harbors

Companies:
godaddy



GoDaddy Sued For $100 Million Because A Website Put Up Copyrighted Photos Of Michael Jackson?

from the you-can't-make-this-stuff-up dept

Honestly, if I wanted to make up this sort of stuff, I couldn't. Apparently domain registrar GoDaddy has been sued for $100 million by a guy who claims to hold the copyright on some photos of Michael Jackson, which appeared on a website with the domain MichaelJacksonCasino.com. Now, I could see a right of publicity argument from the Michael Jackson estate, and maybe there's even a copyright lawsuit for the copyright holder... but they would be against whoever created the website, not GoDaddy. In this lawsuit, I would imagine GoDaddy's lawyers will quickly point out the pertinent DMCA safe harbors and that will be that.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    bob563 (profile), 4 Aug 2010 @ 6:15am

    Obviously...

    ...he chose to sue GoDaddy because the actually HAVE $100 million bucks. It doesn't matter if they are responsible or not in the world of shotgun lawsuits (sue everyone and see who pays).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NullOp, 4 Aug 2010 @ 6:27am

    $$$

    We can only hope this guy loses his suit! I am so sick of the low-life money grubbers!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Riseven, 4 Aug 2010 @ 6:52am

    Terms of Service change

    That could be the reason behind this change in GoDaddy terms of service notification email that I received yesterday:

    "We recently made changes to the Universal Terms of Service Agreement affecting your Go Daddy products and services. These changes include, but are not limited to, the following:

    Section 5 (Your Use of Go Daddy Content and User Content) and Section 6 (Go Daddy's Use of User Content)

    We added language to clarify that the applicable provisions are not intended to and do not have the effect of transferring any ownership or licensed rights (including intellectual property rights) you may have in content posted to your hosted websites. ...."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Aug 2010 @ 7:01am

    Yea but will the Judge really listen. I seriously doubt it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      mike allen (profile), 4 Aug 2010 @ 8:04am

      Re:

      so do I
      The only way to tackle and stop all this crap is to collectivly tell the lawyers and the court stick it up your ass. \Yes i am talking global disabediance.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 4 Aug 2010 @ 8:45am

        Re: Re:

        You would think the courts themselves would be getting sick of this, and passing rulings that discourage wasting their time.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    sumquy, 4 Aug 2010 @ 8:45am

    I think you do yourself a disservice. You absolutely could make this stuff up if you tried. Here, I'll give you a template to get you started.

    [Name generic non responsible party here] Sued For [Put huge sum of money here] Because A Website Put Up Copyrighted [put generic IP here] Of [Put generic big corporation here] on the internet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Aug 2010 @ 9:47am

    You know what's more. I own 80% of Facebook!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Marwan Williams, 22 Sep 2010 @ 3:24pm

    This is nonsense

    If they included the (c) copyright information at the bottom of the photos they should be ok. But also, if they are put on a webpage, they become copyrighted again by the owner of the site. There are companies out there that search for copyrighted material everyday to find something copyrighted.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Marwan Williams, 22 Sep 2010 @ 3:24pm

    This is nonsense

    If they included the (c) copyright information at the bottom of the photos they should be ok. But also, if they are put on a webpage, they become copyrighted again by the owner of the site. There are companies out there that search for copyrighted material everyday to find something copyrighted.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    BestGames (profile), 16 Jan 2011 @ 12:59pm

    Totally stupid. Any fool can sue anyone for anything. The US legal system seems to be a joke and a game best played by well monied corporations.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Home Cooking Is Killing Restaurants
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.