Entertainment Industry Gets Politicians To Advertise File Sharing Sites

from the what-are-they-thinking? dept

Just a few weeks ago, the USTR put out its infamous Special 301 report that tries to shame countries that don't respect US intellectual property laws, but is put together using the rather scientific method of "what countries are the entertainment and pharmaceutical industries complaining about now?" to generate the list. Around the world -- and even in the US gov't -- the list is mostly seen as a joke. No one takes it seriously.

But, apparently one ridiculous list isn't enough. The RIAA and MPAA have convinced a group of US elected officials, who have dubbed themselves the "International Anti-Piracy Caucus" to put out a list of file sharing websites that it hates... and with it, an attempt to shame the companies where those websites are hosted. The timing on this is amusing, because, of course, just last week, you would have needed to put the US on the list, as LimeWire would have likely been seen as just as widely used for unauthorized file sharing as some of those sites.

But the larger point is that this list is effectively advertising these five sites as the best place to go to get unauthorized content:
China's Baidu, Canada's IsoHunt, Ukraine's Mp3fiesta, Germany's RapidShare, Luxembourg's RMX4U.com, and Sweden's The Pirate Bay.
You would think that, by now, the RIAA and MPAA would have recognized that every single time they've targeted a particular service for file sharing, the end result is to get that site significantly more publicity, so that its userbase increases rapidly. It happened when they sued Napster. It happened when they sued Grokster. It happened when they got the police to raid The Pirate Bay. It happened when they filed the lawsuit against IsoHunt. Putting out this list basically just pointed a bunch of people at these particular services as a good place to go to get access to content. Nice work by the caucus, who is made up of Reps. Adam Schiff and Bob Goodlatte along with Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse and Orrin Hatch.

And, of course, the RIAA put out a statement supporting this free advertising for those sites. Honestly, people keep telling me that the RIAA really knows what it's doing, but how can they possibly think that this is a good idea?

As a parallel, reader Hephaestus points out this historical bit:
"From 1559 to 1966 the catholic church had a list of prohibited books aptly named the Index Librorum Prohibitorum. One historical note about this list is that a very large number of the books on this list had an increase in sales and reading when they were placed on the list. The International Anti-Piracy Caucus seems to have not learned the simple historical lesson, To list or expose inappropriate subject matter shines a light on it and exposes it to a larger audience. This will undoubtedly lead to more people visiting this "list of notorious sites" quite the opposite of what they seem to be aiming for.
Nice work, RIAA and MPAA. You just boosted traffic to those sites.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 7:52am

    are you troubled by all the nice work going on today?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Phillip, May 20th, 2010 @ 7:53am

    Obvious Incompetence

    If the RIAA knew what it was doing, they wouldn't be doing any of this crap, anyway. They'd be busy adapting to the market, being innovative, and creating new business models.

    I honestly don't know why it would be a surprise to anyone that they don't learn from history either. The history of media inventions/innovations all points to them being on the side destined to fail. They'll continue to make the same mistakes of the people before them that attempted to squash how people used new media, and eventually they'll collapse under the weight of the impossibility of their task. When that happens, they'll be an awesome new market without fear of retribution from draconian and ignorant organizations, and the people who can figure out how to navigate that market (and get a little lucky) will be insanely rich.

    Until then, just keep doing what you're doing and watch them fall.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    crade (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 7:57am

    Would it help end our oppression if we asked ISOHunt nicely if they would move their server elsewhere? Sure it isn't fair, and I know they are just a search engine, not an actual source of piracy, but when you have an army at your door dead set on overruling your democracy, you sometimes have to make sacrifice you normally wouldn't.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Rose M. Welch (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 8:08am

    Re: Obvious Incompetence

    The RIAA does know what it's doing.

    Remember, it's not run by musicians. It's run by attorneys.

    So they're doing what they do best, and running billing as high as possible. If they screw things up for their clients, oh, well! Their pools and SUVs are paid for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    silly_me, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:18am

    maybe the RIAAs plan is to get as many people as possible to illegally download their stuff so that they can send out all those pre-settlement letters. See, they don't need to go through the distribution process anymore. They just produce crap, promote it, wait for it to be downloaded illegally and then send out pre-settlement letters and/or sue. That IS the new business model.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:20am

    SO whose inducing piracy now?

    BUT BUT they aren't inducing you to pirate ....honestly.
    and correction on #4

    YOU mean there yacht building programs.
    my poor min wage earning neighbor and her min wage hubby have a SUV and a pool

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    David T, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:35am

    The Master Strategy

    If the point is to intimidate people who might try unauthorized channels but haven't yet, taking down a site with massive users and going after that big group of people would make sense.

    But it's premised on assuming those people vising "pirate" sites are disposable, which is arguably short sighted.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    NAMELESS.ONE, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:37am

    Britain looking to repeal the digital wanker bill

    this is why he spews his propoganda today
    yep all whiney not getting hsi own way awwwww
    poor bribable politician see how democracy will work out

    instead of revolution you get change alright
    change of politicians that can't be bribed and do what there fellow citizens want cause they like or want to not for a lil white envelope with cash in it

    thats the innovation he speaks of and how is the celebrity rehab show doing? YAH know where almost all of the popular actors and musicians are drug addicts and drunks or so fraked up its not funny. GREAT MODELS FOR THE KIDS

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    WammerJammer (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 8:38am

    Uh thanks

    Thanks for the list! I needed that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Chapeau d'Aluminium, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:40am

    Re:

    I had the same tin-hatted thought. I'll go a step further and link the incessant whinging about illegal downloading only growing awareness of it (and that it can be done) with the **AAs actually backing the play of such tracking sites for free promotion and follow-up lawsuiting.

    I truly believe if they'd've shut their heads about piracy a decade ago it wouldn't have become such an issue. I guess it was easier than adapting.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:42am

    Napster - Lost case in court

    Grokster - Lost case in court

    LimeWire - Lost case in court

    Wherever the labels can obtain jurisdiction over defendants and the law in such a jurisdiction is generally co-extensive with US law, the labels will pursue such services and litigate to close them down.

    What so many of the readers who follow this site seem to not fully appreciate is that the labels, and others having similar concerns, are not targeting torrent search engine providers en masse. They are targeting those whose "purpose in life" is directed almost exclusively to point users in the direction of where they can find unargualby infringing content and who facilitate use of such engines by interacting with users in a manner that assists such users in acquiring such content. These sites, no matter their protestations to the contrary, have been shown by competent evidence to have participated in one form or another in an active manner, and not merely as dumb pipes. Were these sites truly the latter, the above sites would quite likely still be up and running.

    The Sony test articulated about 1980 borrowed the longstanding test from patent law concerning "capable of substantial non-infringing use". The law is not foolish. When a site has the capability of meeting the Sony test, but when the factual backdrop is examined it is only too clear that actual non-infringing use is miniscule in comparison to infringing uses which such sites actually promote, facilitate, and participate, such sites are playing with fire and will almost certainly be "burned".

    To these sites I say "Concentrate on being merely a dumb pipe and you will likely find safe harbor under Sony and its progeny. Push Sony's boundaries to its limits and you will almost certainly find yourself on the losing end of a lawsuit."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    haha hehe hoho, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:42am

    lil rumor from a hacker

    at least two private trackers are actually run by aspects of hollywood , and they use it as we say to pander to donators and make a buck.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Ryan, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:50am

    Re:

    That's a good point if you're a torrent tracking site trying to develop policy, but this discussion is about the policy decisions of the RIAA, MPAA, etc.

    When they specifically call them out, they drive traffic to them. Sure, they may eventually get them shut down, but look where that's gotten them - here. After they enticed however many people to check out the file sharing sites they read in a news article.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Nathan, May 20th, 2010 @ 8:54am

    Same old tactics from the media industry...

    Every time a piece of news like this comes out, it just makes it clearer that most media companies can't or won't use the opportunities the web provides. They just run to the lawyers even when, as in this case, it does nothing but increase coverage for the 'infringing' site...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 9:10am

    Re:

    So you'd like to give up your freedom to get your freedom?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    Joel (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 9:11am

    Always...

    This always happens once you put a name out there specially in a negative light people want to learn more about it so they start searching and reading and maybe even experimenting with it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 9:15am

    HA!

    It's the whole Napster thing that first told me about filesharing in the first place!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    taoareyou (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 9:18am

    Re: Re: Obvious Incompetence

    You are exactly correct. If their goal was actually reducing uncompensated file sharing it would cut into their income. To increase their own income, they need a constant increase in violations. Tell people where to go, then shake them down for money after they go there.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Orrin Hatch...maybe, May 20th, 2010 @ 9:22am

    Oh that's it! Techdirt, you just made the LIST! *scrawls furiously*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Kurto (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 9:28am

    comparison to history

    We dont have to go back to the Index Librorum Prohibitorum for historical comparison. Just look at how popular hard rock videos became in the 1980s when MTV bowed to pressure to remove supposedly "inappropriate content" from their channel.
    Once it was reavealed that a video had been banned, its popularity shot up. Pretty soon, the worst thing for a rock band was to not have had their video banned from MTV!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    DCX2, May 20th, 2010 @ 9:35am

    Re:

    You sound a lot like a lawyer.

    So...does YouTube fall under "substantial non-infringing use"? I'm lookin' at you, Viacom.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 9:57am

    what i am trying to figure out is this: are there any active file sharers who dont know about these sites? what is the big deal? are they some sort of state secret? it isnt like tpb hasn't been all over the news for the last couple of years. i mark this one down as another mikey attempt to poke at the **aas when there is really nothing to say.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 9:58am

    Re:

    Napster - Lost case in court

    Grokster - Lost case in court

    LimeWire - Lost case in court

    Wherever the labels can obtain jurisdiction over defendants and the law in such a jurisdiction is generally co-extensive with US law, the labels will pursue such services and litigate to close them down.


    And the end result? Each lawsuit got more people hooked on file sharing, and each loss pushed people further to other services that were more underground and more and more difficult for the RIAA/MPAA to use to their own advantage.

    Brilliant.

    I'm confused why you believe this was a smart strategy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    crade (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 10:01am

    Re: Re:

    meh, we are always giving up some freedoms to gain others.. That's what law is about!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    minijedimaster (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 10:05am

    Re:

    Good thing I signed up to use anonymous proxies and 256bit encryption for my torrent client/traffic then. Catch me now bitches!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 10:07am

    Re: Re:

    The facts in You Tube are markedly different from those associated with Napster, Grokster and LimeWire. However, I dare not predict the likely outcome simply because it will be based upon the evidentiary record presented to the court, and I have no insight into the totality of the record.

    It is fair to say, however, that YouTube has taken an approach far more conservative that the above torrent sites such that the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA may be deemed to be satisfied.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 10:10am

    Re:

    Speaking of nothing to say . . . .

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 10:25am

    Re:

    Yes I'm quite certain there are a lot of active file sharers who don't know about at least some of those sites. More to the point though, I'm sure there are plenty of NON-active file sharers who now know all about those sites thanks to the inadvertent publicity. That's what the entire point of the article was.

    Do you ever feel bad that you get paid to spew sophist gibberish on a website all day? Some people make the world a better place while they are in it. You spend your time honing idiocy to a fine art.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 10:36am

    Re:

    The logical fallacies coming out of you lately are so amusing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 10:39am

    Re: Re:

    That's an insult to idiocy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    Wesha (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:01am

    Why has nobody mentioned the Streisand Effect yet?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 11:15am

    Re: Re:

    hi mike. i see you have increased your staff action to try to shout me down. congrats. you have made it up to kindergarten tactics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:25am

    Re: comparison to history

    Yeah! 2 Live Crew wasn't that good but the ban made this pre-teen and all his friends want to hear their album even more. Ah...the priorities of middle schoolers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 11:25am

    Re: Re:

    Do you have evidence to back up this assertion that these suits "got more people hooked on file sharing?"

    I mean, iTunes and similar services have flourished since those rulings. It's possible that the growth of those legit download services were helped by these suits.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:25am

    Re: comparison to history

    "We dont have to go back to the Index Librorum Prohibitorum for historical comparison."

    Actually we could go back 1500 years further than the Index Librorum Prohibitorum to Rome. Where they had this sub sect of a religion that was banned. Their symbol was the letter "t" with a dead guy on it. As far as I can tell banning that sub sect worked really well ... big Ole GRIN

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:27am

    Re:

    I hadn't heard of mp3fiesta but I find the name hilarious being based in the Ukraine.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    icon
    Steven (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:28am

    Hmm..

    Never heard of Mp3fiesta or RMX4U.com

    _>
    brb

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:29am

    Re:

    Thanks for the mention!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 11:43am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Speaking of children . . . .

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 12:42pm

    Rapidshare

    Not sure why rapidshare makes it onto this list.

    They do try to block infringing content, and they don't offer a search facility. They are basically a mechanism for sending files that are too big to email.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    Sick of the Same Old Song and Dance, May 20th, 2010 @ 12:46pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    And yet filesharing still happens despite the suits and iTunes. Hence the standing shoulder to shoulder w/blindered congresscritters shouting about exactly where to go for it.

    Perhaps 'hooked' isn't the best word. 'Made aware', most definitely.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 12:49pm

    Re: Rapidshare

    Agreed. I use it sometimes for big personal file transfers THAT DON'T INFRINGE ON SQUAT.

    Why not Photobucket and Flickr for good measure? Someone might be uploading a movie .jpg by .jpg!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Tom Landry (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 2:33pm

    I hate how ISOHunt works now. I understand they had to make changes in order to stay alive but.....blech.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 3:19pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Law is about making money.
    No laws, no criminals, no money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 3:25pm

    Re: Re: Rapidshare

    Skype too! Which also uses P2P tech.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 3:26pm

    Re:

    I hadn't noticed any changes. I am in Canada though, if that makes a difference.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 5:36pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    lol, you've been getting pathetic lately

    I (we?) liked you better when you actually tried...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 20th, 2010 @ 5:53pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    The great fun is that not everyone who disagrees with you, or thinks your tactics childish, is Mike. I'd hazard to guess that none of them using the Anonymous Coward tag are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    icon
    The Groove Tiger (profile), May 20th, 2010 @ 11:42pm

    Re:

    Everyone knows that Toyota exists. They're still made more aware of it whenever the TV mentions them.

    It's called advertising. Man you're dense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    asd, May 21st, 2010 @ 1:53am

    a;lsd;lask

    Hey Check this site www.way2mobile.in

    Free Downloading of | Computer & Mobile | Games, Movies, Software, Songs, Videos,
    Wallpapers, Themes, Ringtones, Tutorials, Trick & Tips etc..

    Hey Check this site www.way2mobile.in

    Free Downloading of | Computer & Mobile | Games, Movies, Software, Songs, Videos,
    Wallpapers, Themes, Ringtones, Tutorials, Trick & Tips etc..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 21st, 2010 @ 5:56am

    Re: Re: Re:

    why would anyone need more than one person to "shout you down" when even a five year old can debunk your bs easily, TAM?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 21st, 2010 @ 12:01pm

    Re: a;lsd;lask

    SPAMMER!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    identicon
    monkyyy, May 21st, 2010 @ 12:04pm

    "China's Baidu" never heard of it should check it out

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    OldGeek, May 21st, 2010 @ 3:55pm

    And....

    "Honestly, people keep telling me that the RIAA really knows what it's doing, but how can they possibly think that this is a good idea? " Of course they do, they don't want to stop file sharing, if they do then they're outta work.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    identicon
    UnkieReamus, May 21st, 2010 @ 5:37pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Seriously?

    First, let's go ahead and drop the obligatory Ben Franklin quote: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.".

    And time you think, say, read or hear the words "Giving up some freedom", "Sacrificing a small freedom" or any variation thereof, you really ought to be incredibly suspicious. There's something not kosher there.

    Second, I have no idea what freedom you're suggesting is being gained here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This