by Mike Masnick
Wed, May 12th 2010 1:46am
While there are still ongoing arguments over whether or not bloggers should be considered journalists when it comes to keeping their sources and source materials confidential, there's another arena impacted by all of this as well: documentary filmmakers. A judge has ordered a documentary filmmaker to turn over "cut" footage to Chevron from the filmmaker's documentary about Chevron's involvement in pollution of the rainforest in Ecuador. Chevron believes that there may be footage that will help it get a lawsuit filed against the company by Ecuadorians dismissed. While the filmmaker argued that the works were protected, the judge shot that down in saying that since there were no confidentiality agreements signed, that the material is not confidential. That seems like a rather broad ruling over whether or not a journalist can protect their sources. Do all journalists now need to sign confidentiality agreements with sources?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Theater Chains Pout, Boycott Netflix's New Movie To Protect Antiquated Release Windows
- Despite Losing Money Year After Year, States Still Wondering How They Can Hand Out BIGGER Subsidies To Hollywood
- Apparently The Best Way To Decrease Movie Piracy Is To Get Rid Of The Oscars
- DailyDirt: The Risks Of Fossil Fuels
- Why Tribunals Imposing Corporate Sovereignty Are Even More Dangerous Than We Thought