Thu, Apr 22nd 2010 8:11pm
Skype has been one of the louder voices in pushing for broadband providers to be forced to keep their networks open. One of the company's execs has taken to its blog supporting net neutrality regulations in the EU, making some useful points about how it's services like Skype that sell broadband subscriptions and, specifically, mobile data plans. But how does that reconcile with Skype's mobile moves in the US, where it appears to be pushing exclusive deals with operators over "open" access? So, on the one hand, Skype doesn't want to have to pay telcos for access to its customers. But then on the other, it looks like Skype wants to charge telcos to be able to offer its service to their customers. This makes it look like Skype is okay with pay-to-play systems, but only when it's on the receiving end. Certainly Skype is free to use whatever business model it likes, but it certainly appears it's trying to have the best of both worlds here.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- One ISP's Prices Are So Bad, It Refuses To Tell Anyone What They Are
- AT&T Publicly Promises Tennessee A Broadband Revolution, Privately Fights To Keep It A Broadband Backwater
- AT&T Shows Cupertino Precisely What Broadband Competition (Or The Lack Thereof) Looks Like
- Net Neutrality Under Threat In India
- Microsoft Agrees To Hand Over Skype User Data To Russian Police