Arizona Politician Accused Of Using Voter Database To Stalk Young Woman

from the database-abuse dept

We've talked in the past about how pretty much any government database eventually gets abused by someone looking for info about someone beyond the scope of what the database is for, and now Michael Scott points us to news of how the executive director of the Arizona Republican Party, Bruce Mecum, has been accused of using the party's voter database to stalk a female grad student. This isn't a "government" database, as it's just the political party's database. But, the database is used like a marketing database to better target messages. Or stalking opportunities, which apparently seriously creeped out some people. The response from the party's treasurer wasn't exactly reassuring:
"He used Voter Vault. The The Republican National Committee owns Voter Vault....It's a private list. We own the list. We can do what we want with the list, quite frankly."
Including stalking? This isn't a "Republican" thing either. I'm sure some Democrats misuse their databases as well, so hopefully the comments can avoid blindly supporting or hating on this or that political party. The key point here is that it's yet another example of a database that's supposed to be used for one purpose, being used for stalking instead.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Joe (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 9:59am

    Yikes

    That response is pretty creepy. And they Republican party wonders why they keep losing so many voters...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Marcus Carab (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:06am

      Re: Yikes

      ....aaaand the partisan comments begin immediately. Luvverly.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:09am

        Re: Re: Yikes

        "....aaaand the partisan comments begin immediately. Luvverly."

        Yeah, I was going to do a "good luck with that" comment as soon as I saw Mike's line, but I figured I'd give everyone a shot.

        Oh well, seems more people need to be educated on how both parties are equally evil because they all end up reporting to the same bosses....

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          bwp (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 11:03am

          Re: Re: Re: Yikes

          **Oh well, seems more people need to be educated on how both parties are equally evil because they all end up reporting to the same bosses....**

          Unfortunately those bosses aren't the citizens but the corporations.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Dark Helmet (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 11:21am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Yikes

            "Unfortunately those bosses aren't the citizens but the interational bankers."

            FTFY. You were on the right track, just one step short. After all, you both finances and sits on the boards of the large corporations?

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Joe (profile), 22 Dec 2009 @ 5:16pm

          Re: Re: Re: Yikes

          Whoa whoa whoa, you're not implying I simply vote the other party now, are you? I'm simply saying that THAT party is pretty messed up, for better or worse, and this story isn't helping them out...

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      interval, 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:47am

      Re: Yikes

      "And they Republican party wonders why they keep losing so many voters..."

      Right. You'd never catch a Democrat, like, say, Bill Clinton misusing his position to say, get a blow job in the Oval Office. Wait...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Derek Bredensteiner (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 12:06pm

      Re: Yikes

      Way to go Joe ...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:02am

    How are these particular lists made anyway?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Another AC, 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:11am

    Buuuut...

    Why not let the government have their databases, after all if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    bshock, 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:18am

    It's difficult for me to get excited about a politician misusing his authority.

    But I do feel a certain smug confirmation of what mindless neanderthals these creatures happen to be. Apparently Mr. Mecum doesn't understand how very quick and easy it is to track someone down via the Internet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Designerfx (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:25am

    well

    both dems and republicans can obtain your SOC via just your zip code and your last name, if you've ever registered to vote. It's disgutsting.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    CastorTroy-Libertarian, 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:38am

    Im in a 3rd party, and while id like to think it wouldnt happen to us, unfortunatly it most likely will....or has...

    I would think both Mecum and the Treasurer would be kicked out of the party, one for mis-use, and the other for being a douchebag...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 10:48am

      Re:

      "Im in a 3rd party, and while id like to think it wouldnt happen to us, unfortunatly it most likely will....or has..."

      The shame is that the current political system requires a party at all.

      People can have their groups, I guess. I just think it's better to have individual ideas....

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Derek Bredensteiner (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 12:15pm

        Re: Re:

        Here here - I'm hereby forming the NonParty. No agenda, no ideals, nothing. Not even an agenda that says "we have no agenda".

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Dark Helmet (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 12:27pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          "Here here - I'm hereby forming the NonParty. No agenda, no ideals, nothing. Not even an agenda that says "we have no agenda"."

          Outstanding. We'll spend our time talking about nothingness, watching shows about nothing like Seinfeld, and voting independently, without having our preferences prescribed to us....

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Lance (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 11:09am

    Another way to look at it...

    What's the solution to this kind of thing? How is the line here different than when other people blame some technology for a societal ill (i.e. video games are practice grounds for violent behavior)?

    Did the fact that such a database exists cause someone to misuse the data, or did the person choose to misuse the database? The bottom line is that if you create a database then there is some likelihood that it will be misused by those that have the means to access it.

    Do not fall into the trap that we often accuse others of falling into, blaming the technology for enabling a person's bad behavior.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      jjmsan (profile), 18 Dec 2009 @ 11:42am

      Re: Another way to look at it...

      The existance of a database is not being objected to. The article was being used to point to the fact that large accumulations of information are misused and the entity that has access to large amount of info about us is the government. Furthermore we are required by law to supply that information in many cases. Also your boldface key seems to have gotten stuck

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Murdoch's #37 fan, 18 Dec 2009 @ 11:20am

    Another perv Republican. Potentially the only political party with more members in the closet or perving on something than actually straight and normal.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2009 @ 12:02pm

    Both the Democrats and Republicans running Arizona don't seem to have much intelligence. Pervs, illegal alien sympathizers, politicians taking personal loans from businesses they rallied to have money invested into from the state, etc. We got them all here.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brad Morrison, 18 Dec 2009 @ 1:31pm

    Chris Greenwood (Phoenix Independent Examiner) asserts that Mecum's misuse of Voter Vault constitutes a felony. I agree in principle, since the input is state voter registration records. VV is 20 years old, though, so the GOP may have managed to wire in exceptions in most, maybe all states.

    Google Mecum. He's quite a character. I think he should walk for this one to get his arrogance puffed up enough to do something truly stupid. His explanation for the troubles he's had is that his Democratic enemies are setting him up.

    So maybe his next caper will require a Republican to administer the smackdown.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brad Morrison, 18 Dec 2009 @ 1:37pm

    Felony, FYI

    The original article states, "In fact, it is a felony to use the voter registration database (aka Voter Vault) for anything other than official purposes. In Arizona, misuse of the voter registration database is a Class 6 felony, which means Mecum could face a couple of years in the clink if convicted. If the staffer knew why he was looking up the woman's information, the staffer could also face charges. Additionally, to access Voter Vault, which is a customized interface for the database, the user must sign an agreement with the Republican Party saying they will only use the database for party-related business."

    Wait a minute ... isn't AZ the home of that bat$#!+ crazy sheriff?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mikey, 19 Sep 2011 @ 8:12pm

    So If The Shoe Is On The Other Foot?

    So since it's a private database, then using their logic, if I acquire a database of all their party members that have a net worth of more than $1 million dollars from a list broker and steal their identities to get some cash, then it's OK. After all, it's a private database, right?

    While I wouldn't do that, who is to say that the next "stalker" misappropriating their database won't?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.