by Mike Masnick
Wed, Sep 16th 2009 1:01am
There have been plenty of stories concerning judges warning jurors not to research any additional items about a case online, but JJ points us to what is apparently a first (at least in California). A judge has ordered the jury to sign a document that they will not use the internet to research the case, and they can face perjury charges if they're caught doing so. Apparently, the reasoning is that most jurors tend to ignore the spoken warning. My guess is that many will ignore the signed promise as well -- in fact, as some behavioral research has shown, just telling them not to do it, may make them even more likely to do so. At some point, the courts are going to have to realize that you simply can't prevent people from looking up more info, and will have to come up with ways to adapt.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Congress Passes Permanent Internet Access Tax Ban... But May Enable More e-Commerce Sales Tax
- Google Partially Caves To French Demands For More Global Censorship Of 'Forgotten' Links
- 20 Years Ago Today: The Most Important Law On The Internet Was Signed, Almost By Accident
- French Politicians Pushing To Ban Linking To Any Website Without Permission
- DHS Official Thinks People Should Have To Give Up Their Anonymity To Use The Internet