by Mike Masnick
Wed, Sep 16th 2009 1:01am
There have been plenty of stories concerning judges warning jurors not to research any additional items about a case online, but JJ points us to what is apparently a first (at least in California). A judge has ordered the jury to sign a document that they will not use the internet to research the case, and they can face perjury charges if they're caught doing so. Apparently, the reasoning is that most jurors tend to ignore the spoken warning. My guess is that many will ignore the signed promise as well -- in fact, as some behavioral research has shown, just telling them not to do it, may make them even more likely to do so. At some point, the courts are going to have to realize that you simply can't prevent people from looking up more info, and will have to come up with ways to adapt.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Court Reminds Police That Refusing A Search Isn't Inherently Suspicious Behavior
- Certification: How The US Demands Even More Concessions After Trade Agreements Have Been Signed And Ratified
- Border Patrol Agents Tase Woman For Refusing To Cooperate With Their Bogus Search
- Verizon Buys AOL, Because Two Lumbering Dinosaurs Who Can't Figure Out The Modern Internet Must Be Better Together
- Stanford Prison Experiment Psychologist: You're Never Going To Get Laid, You Game-Playing, Porn-Watching Fat-Asses