by Mike Masnick
Mon, Aug 24th 2009 11:28pm
One of the common refrains from folks in the newspaper industry is that, despite their inability to react to the changing market in front of them, they need to be kept alive, because of their civic duty of serving the public and preserving democracy. At least that's how the argument goes. However, Steve Yelvington points us to a good point made by Rick Edmonds, noting that if it's so important for the newspapers to serve the public, doesn't it make it much harder for them to do that behind a paywall. In other words, in their zeal to lock up the content, they're proving that they don't mean what they say when they talk about just serving the public. They really only mean that they're serving the segment of the public willing to pay -- which doesn't quite have that same noble civic duty feel to it, now does it?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Predictable: The Fragmented Media Will Give Us All Our Post-Oregon-Shooting Outrage Blankets
- Army Officials Withheld FOIA Documents To Push Out Its Spin On Head Injuries
- State Department 'Planted' Anti-Wikileaks Questions For 60 Minutes Interview With Julian Assange
- Toronto Sun: We Value Criticism And The Voice Of The Reader So Much, We're Killing Both
- Apple Bans Non-Graphic, VR Representation Of Ferguson Shooting For No Coherent Reason