by Mike Masnick
Fri, May 8th 2009 9:58am
Trent Reznor already did a wonderful job explaining Apple's hypocrisy in rejecting the NIN iPhone app because you could stream some content from The Downward Spiral, which Apple found objectionable... even though you could buy the same music via the iTunes store. However, reader Yakko Warner points us to a similar case as well. Apparently, Apple has rejected an app that pulls in newspaper content from many newspapers because some of that content includes the famous (or infamous) "Page 3" from The Sun, in the UK, which is normally filled with images of topless women. But, of course, anyone with an iPhone could just as easily use the web browser to surf right over to the website for Page 3 and see the exact same photos. So why is it suddenly "objectionable" when the very same functionality comes in a separate app?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Chinese Company Learns From The West: Builds Up Big Patent Portfolio, Uses It To Sue Apple In China
- UK's Snooper's Charter Includes Mandatory Backdoors For Encryption
- Apple Punishes iFixit For Doing A Tear Down On Apple TV
- Apple Bans Non-Graphic, VR Representation Of Ferguson Shooting For No Coherent Reason
- South Carolina Massacre Results In Apple Going Flag-Stupid In The App Store