by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 26th 2009 3:59pm
There has been a series of complaints from the White House press pool since President Obama was sworn in last week, about the fact that he's apparently not living up to his promises of transparency -- specifically in that he hasn't been giving those mainstream press members access to certain things. However, as Ethan Kaplan notes, transparency and access to the media are not the same thing -- and if the administration is putting up all of the information on the web where anyone can get it, rather than just handing stuff to the media, isn't that a lot more transparent? This is a good point, and it will certainly be worth watching how things change over time. Transparency is important, but transparency can be done in many ways, and routing around the media is certainly one of those ways -- no matter how angry it may make the press.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- There Is No Way That Hillary Clinton Didn't Know She Was Supposed To Use A Government Email Account
- Cars Are Delivering Tons Of Driving Data To Manufacturers With Minimal Security And Even Less Transparency
- Net Neutrality Opponents Ignore History In Pretending FCC's Decision Breaks Some Made Up Rules
- If We're Going To Fix Copyright, We Need Much More Transparency
- USTR Still Insists That 'Listening' Is 'Transparency' Even As It Keeps Details Completely Secret