by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 26th 2009 3:59pm
There has been a series of complaints from the White House press pool since President Obama was sworn in last week, about the fact that he's apparently not living up to his promises of transparency -- specifically in that he hasn't been giving those mainstream press members access to certain things. However, as Ethan Kaplan notes, transparency and access to the media are not the same thing -- and if the administration is putting up all of the information on the web where anyone can get it, rather than just handing stuff to the media, isn't that a lot more transparent? This is a good point, and it will certainly be worth watching how things change over time. Transparency is important, but transparency can be done in many ways, and routing around the media is certainly one of those ways -- no matter how angry it may make the press.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- With So Much Public Interest In Our Judicial System, It's Time To Free Up Access To Court Documents
- Chris Christie Says Asset Forfeiture Transparency Is Bad For Law Enforcement, Vetoes Unanimously-Supported Bill
- President Trump's White House Reaching New Lows In Accountability And Transparency
- FBI Changes FOIA Policies, Tries To Route More Requesters To Fax Machines, Mailboxes
- Why Does It Still Take Press Attention For Comcast To Fix Obvious Screw Ups?