Isn't There An Easier Way To Tax Online Gambling?

from the roundabout dept

One of the founders of British online gambling site PartyGaming yesterday pleaded guilty to a charge of transmitting bets across state lines -- and agreed to pay the US government $300 million. The exec, Anurag Dikshit, wasn't one of those nabbed by US authorities as they changed planes in the US, but rather he came forward on his own in an attempt to clear the legal air surrounding him and his company. It appears that the US government has rewarded him with leniency: he's free on $15 million bond with some loose travel restrictions ahead of his sentencing -- scheduled for December 2010. This latest news follows the guilty plea of an executive of NETeller, which processed payments for gambling sites, who forfeited $100 million to the government, while the company itself coughed up $136 million. So from these three instances alone, the government has taxed, er, fined, gaming sites and execs over half a billion dollars. If revenue generation is the goal, why not simply legalize online gambling, then regulate and tax it? That way, the government gets its slice, while US citizens can enjoy some protection while betting, instead of being forced into the grey market where they're largely at the whim of site owners.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. identicon
    AWESOME!!, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 11:58am

    Anurag Dikshit




    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:00pm

    Ok.. somebody has to say it...


    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Ima Fish, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:02pm

    "That way, the government gets its slice..."

    Because the government sees no reason to settle for a mere slice when it can get the whole pie.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Rambo, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:14pm

    What's the name again?!

    I had to pause for a moment and reflect on this exec's name. LOL

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    John D (profile), Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:17pm

    Re: the whole pie.

    But it's not getting the whole pie. It's getting a dinky little slice that it has to spend a whole lot of time/money/manpower getting.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Vikrant Bhargava, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:46pm

    Re: Anurag Dikshit

    That name is awesome (not it Junior High) but otherwise...

    I think he should change it to Anurag "Monster" Dikshit and pay a license fee to Monster Cable because they have been "Dikshits" for years and the name Dikshit is synonymous with their company and its products!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    astontechno, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:50pm

    tax a bet when you place a bet

    every transactional keystroke is taxed...
    every time you hit a key to initiate a bet it is taxed
    you say that right up front
    everyone will know and the taxman gets it

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    JJ, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 12:51pm

    When you're that rich...

    Wikipedia: "Anurag Dikshit ... is a billionaire Indian businessman, the richest man in Gibraltar and the 207th richest man in the world."

    If I were that rich, I wouldn't give a dikshit what my name was either.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Rosetta Stoned, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 2:37pm

    Anurag Dikshit is four years younger than me, and he's a multi-billionaire. I'm not.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 2:58pm

    Re: Anurag Dikshit

    On a rag?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Mark, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 3:16pm

    300 Million to this guy is like a penny to most folks. He just did the equivilent of throwing his shoe and yelling dog to the US Gov't for their ridiculous stance about Online gambling.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Mark Regan, Dec 17th, 2008 @ 7:14pm

    That Might Set a Precedent

    If we legalize gambling then we'd take organized criminals out of the mix. Then pro football and basketball would be fair.

    Then we'd have to legalize drugs next to get organized criminals out of that industry. Then who would kill 5000 Mexican Mules annually, along with an equal number of US overdoses which kill OUR citizens.

    Next our country Sheriff (I live in a DRY country) would have to put his campaign contributors out of business so they would not compete with LEGAL beer and wine sales in the retail stores. It's better to have the evil alcohol sold out of living rooms and garages instead of restaurants, right?

    And what about prostitution? Legalizing gambling would create a precedent for legalizing purchased sex. Then all the drug addicted hookers would lose customers to good looking housewives competing for the same business out of their living rooms.

    We LOVE organized criminals running our gambling industry, our sporting contests, our recreational drug marketplace, our underground "untaxed" alcohol business, our sex traders, and let us not forget our elected officials who cater to the organized criminals who BUY them with their campaign contributions.

    We are happy in our complacency. Please do not disturb us with such complicated, unromantic "tax" issues. That's what we hire our legislators for.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 18th, 2008 @ 4:52am

    I've worked for a number of online gambling companies in Europe and they are already regulated - according to the Countries in which they are based.

    This includes a company I worked with in Gibraltar which uses a system of law very closely derived from English law -

    These companies are lawful, audited and in some cases listed on stock exchanges which add additonal levels of regulation.

    PartyGaming are already compliant with these local laws yet are still able to operate legally and ethically in other non-EU countries so why should they also have to comply with tax-hungry US laws when they have no physical base there?

    Techdirt surely doesn't pay tax to Gibraltar so why should a Gibraltar based company pay tax to America?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    casinodad, Dec 21st, 2008 @ 6:16am

    Big money

    revenue is generats the goals, we should legalize online gambling and Las Vegas slots, The government will increase their budget with that money

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    koyali, Feb 15th, 2009 @ 8:52pm


    hi this is Koyali and i will provide information about gambling so this is useful for so many people.Sportsbook-watch provide in-depth reviews and recommendations of the top gambling sites on the web. Sportsbook-watch review sportsbooks, poker websites and casino websites.

    gambling websites

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    derf, Jan 30th, 2010 @ 1:39am

    gambling money

    in oklahoma much of the money I gamble is not reported . only 2,500 at a time!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    derf, Jan 30th, 2010 @ 1:41am

    Re: gambling money

    ways to get extra gambling money

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Advertisement - Amazon Prime Music
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.