by Mike Masnick
Wed, Nov 19th 2008 3:46pm
A court has issued an injunction temporarily banning the sale of a keylogger product called RemoteSpy. The ruling probably makes sense under the current FTC law, but it does raise some questions about whether it really makes sense to ban the sale of such a program, versus just the use of one. I can certainly understand why you might want to ban the sale of such programs, because if they're sold, they're perhaps more likely to be used. However, it still seems wrong to make it illegal to sell some software because that software can be used for illegal activities. Shouldn't the liability belong to those who actually use the software for illegal purposes?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Recent Law School Grad Sues Twitter Because Someone Made A Parody Twitter Account
- Yet Another Lawsuit Hopes A Court Will Hold Twitter Responsible For Terrorists' Actions
- Victims Of Car Crash Sue Apple For Not Preventing Distracted Driver From Hitting Their Vehicle
- Ridiculous German Court Ruling Means Linking Online Is Now A Liability
- Court Not Impressed By Airbnb's Argument Against The City Of San Francisco