by Mike Masnick
Wed, Nov 19th 2008 3:46pm
A court has issued an injunction temporarily banning the sale of a keylogger product called RemoteSpy. The ruling probably makes sense under the current FTC law, but it does raise some questions about whether it really makes sense to ban the sale of such a program, versus just the use of one. I can certainly understand why you might want to ban the sale of such programs, because if they're sold, they're perhaps more likely to be used. However, it still seems wrong to make it illegal to sell some software because that software can be used for illegal activities. Shouldn't the liability belong to those who actually use the software for illegal purposes?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- As Expected Judge Upholds His Own Problematic Ruling Concerning Cox's Repeat Infringer Policy & The DMCA
- Appeals Court Rejects Revenge Pornster's Appeal; Another Bad Section 230 Ruling
- RIAA: How Dare The Internet Use The DMCA That We Wrote To Build Useful Services!
- EU Court Of Justice Advocate General Says Open WiFi Operators Shouldn't Be Liable For Infringement
- Facebook Not Legally Liable For 'JerkingMan' Video Posted By One Of Its Users