by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 30th 2008 5:44pm
Back in 2005, we wrote about Sun's doomed plans to offer an "open source DRM" solution. Not surprisingly, that went nowhere fast. Last year, Tim Lee took apart the claims of "Marlin," a supposedly new "open source DRM" solution. As Tim noted, open source and DRM are a contradiction in terms. So, it's not clear why last week some were celebrating the latest version of Marlin. As some pointed out, just because it's open source, doesn't mean that it should be "blessed" by the tech crowd. DRM is about destroying options for what you can do with bits. Open source is about multiplying the options. To mix them together makes no sense.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Consumer Reports Proposes Open Source Security Standard To Keep The Internet Of Things From Sucking
- Tim Berners-Lee Endorses DRM In HTML5, Offers Depressingly Weak Defense Of His Decision
- Counterpoint: As Denuvo Lauds Its Weeks-Long Control, 20 Year Old Game Still Selling Due To Its Modding Community
- Funcom Responds Well To Mixup Over Denuvo DRM Resulting In Piracy Of Conan Exiles Game
- Windows DRM: Now An (Unwitting) Ally In Efforts To Expose Anonymous Tor Users