by Mike Masnick
Wed, Oct 1st 2008 4:54am
As was widely expected following earlier statements from politicians such as Russ Feingold, legislation has now been introduced that would curb Homeland Security's ability to randomly search laptops at the border, instead, requiring them to have a "reasonable suspicion" of illegal activity before they can search or copy a hard drive. This would be a huge step forward in terms of reasonable levels of privacy at the border. While defenders of the random search program claim that it's necessary, they give little proof. You can tell because their arguments could equally be applied to searching a random person on the street as well, as they just give vague platitudes about protecting the country from harm. Yet our country has privacy rights and probable cause for a very good reason. It's nice to actually see some politicians standing up to make sure that Homeland Security live up to those ideals.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Legislator Thinks Warrantless Cell Phone Searches The Best Way To Combat Distracted Driving
- Homeland Security Admits It Seized A Hip Hop Blog For Five Years Despite No Evidence Of Infringement; RIAA Celebrates
- Who Needs A No-Fly List When You Can Just Ground 91 Million Citizens?
- Fourth Amendment Update: 'Community Caretaking' Narrowly Defined; 'Inevitable' Discovery No Excuse For Illegal Discovery
- Rep. Michael McCaul Proposes 'Commission' To 'Force' Silicon Valley To Undermine Encryption