by Mike Masnick
Fri, Aug 22nd 2008 4:02pm
We wrote about the woman who was fined $30,000 for file sharing a pinball video game earlier this week, noting that the press seemed to be taking the word of the law firm that sued her, Davenport Lyons, as if it were fact. That seemed problematic -- and we should have realized that it was even more problematic than initially noted. TorrentFreak has turned up the fact that this was a default judgment against the woman, meaning that she didn't even show up in court to defend herself. Effectively, the court more or less had to decide this way. Davenport Lyons, of course, implied that she had fought the case and lost -- and thus, everyone else would be better off just paying based on the pre-settlement letters that the firm seems to send out in bulk. But that's not necessarily true. There's no indication how a court would rule if an actual defense were put forth.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Operators Of Revenge Porn Site YouGotPosted Hit With $900,000 Default Judgment
- Should The Punishment For Falsely Accusing People Of A Crime Match The Punishment For The Crime Itself?
- Rogers Exec Pouts About VPNs, Publicly Dreams Of Canadian Ban
- UK Copyright Trolling Pioneers Sanctioned For Actions
- UK Lawyers Who Originated 'Pay Up Or We'll Sue' Knew They Were Threatening Innocents