by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jun 27th 2008 4:57pm
It's been shown over and over again that violent video games don't lead to violence -- but that hasn't stopped anti-video game crusaders from looking for any example that suggests otherwise. It appears they're having a field day with a bunch of stupid teenagers on Long Island who went on a rampage saying they were acting out scenes from Grand Theft Auto. The mistake here is to blame GTA for the acts. These kids were bored and decided to go on a rampage. If it wasn't copying GTA, it would have been for some other reason. Furthermore, just because the kids blame GTA, doesn't mean that GTA was responsible. Of course kids will blame GTA if they think that will get them out of jail: "It wasn't my fault, you see. I was under the influence of some video game..." It's an easy way to deflect blame, but doesn't mean that the blame shouldn't rest squarely on the shoulders of those kids, rather than the video game. Millions of people play GTA every day and have no intention of acting it out in real life.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- James Comey Still Trying To Blame Increase In Violent Crime On 'Viral Videos'
- The Broadband Industry Is Now Officially Blaming Google (Alphabet) For...Everything
- Congressman Wants To Make Attacking A Cop A Federal 'Hate' Crime
- Surprise: Court Allows Lindsay Lohan's Suit Against Take-Two Interactive To Go Forward
- Once Again, The Brussels Attacks Were An Intelligence Community Failure, Not An 'Encryption' Problem