by Mike Masnick
Wed, Jun 18th 2008 6:01am
Remember the ridiculous Julie Amero case in Connecticut? That was the one where a substitute teacher was facing jail time because the computer she used in a classroom had malware that displayed pornographic images. The local prosecutors wanted to send her to jail, despite the fact that it was the malware that put up the porn. It looks like a similar situation (luckily, without the jailtime) is playing itself out in Massachusetts. There, a "computer illiterate" state employee was fired for child porn found on his computer. After hiring a computer forensics expert, who pointed out that the state's IT department hadn't configured the machines securely and that it was chock full of malware, the guy has been cleared of child porn charges -- but that doesn't change the fact that he's been disgraced and out of work for over a year.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Agent's Testimony Shows FBI Not All That Interested In Ensuring The Integrity Of Its Forensic Evidence
- FBI Sends Computer Information Collected By Its Hacking Tools In Unencrypted Form Over The Open Internet
- FBI Internal Report Says FBI's 2007 Impersonation Of An AP Journalist Not Exactly By The Book
- Judge Says The FBI Can Keep Its Hacking Tool Secret, But Not The Evidence Obtained With It
- Another Court Finds FBI's NIT Warrants To Be Invalid, But Credits Agents' 'Good Faith' To Deny Suppression