IFPI's New Strategy: Sue ISPs For Not Stopping File Sharing

from the making-life-even-worse-for-themselves dept

Earlier this year, the IFPI was successful in convincing a court to force a Danish ISP to block access to the Pirate Bay. Rather than recognizing that this only helped drive more traffic to the Pirate Bay, the folks at the IFPI seem to have gotten it into their heads that the best course of action is to start suing ISPs for not stopping file sharing. Its first target is the large Irish ISP Eircom. Eircom points out all the obvious things: it has no idea what its users are doing on the network, it’s just providing the network — and no one had made it aware of any specific infringing activity. Rather than deal with those very reasonable questions, the record labels responded with the ridiculous “but you know it’s happening!” response which we’ve heard all too often these days. Of course, knowing that unauthorized file sharing is happening on your network and being either liable or able to stop it are two very different things. Basically, the record labels seem to be admitting that they are unable to stop file sharing, so it must be someone else’s job. Even worse, they seem to be saying that it’s a legal responsibility of someone else to try to prop up their own failed business model. Talk about grasping at straws. I’m not sure if Ireland has laws like the US’s safe harbor provisions protecting service providers from liability for the actions of users, but hopefully the Irish courts quickly realize how ridiculous it is to pin liability on an ISP and throw this case out. What’s also partly disturbing is the fact that the “but you know it’s happening!” comment comes from an EMI exec, just after we thought EMI was moving away from ridiculous IFPI lawsuits. Apparently not.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: eircom, ifpi

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “IFPI's New Strategy: Sue ISPs For Not Stopping File Sharing”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
21 Comments
SteveD says:

Re: making the torrent system

But encryption systems already exist for torrent networks.

Forcing ISPs to monitor torrents (if it was even legal to do so) will simply cause torrent developers to switch to exclusively encrypted systems.

If the last ten years have shown us anything its that the more pressure thats placed upon pirates the faster they innovate to escape that pressure.

Its clear that the IFPI is looking for a landmark ruling on this issue so it can then be pushed upon other Nations. The question that no ones askingy is why of all the countries in the world did they choose Ireland as their battleground?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: making the torrent system

Learn about a protocol before you spout stuff.

1) The encryption is weak, and only hides WHAT it is (eg a Torrent) not what is IN it (some David Bowie albums).

2) Even when encrypted you just have to monitor the port. 6881-6999 are the only ports Bit Torrent listens to. If it isn’t in that range, it’s not going to find it without changing the protocol. Oh and that’s only for *inbound* traffic, and you’ll need one port for every Torrent going.

The trackers listen to port 6969. Just that one (usually). That can be changed, but then it’d be documented. ISPs can shut down the majority torrents just by blocking that one port.

BitTorrent is not built for hiding _anything_. It is an amazing protocol and has a LOT of practical uses. It is extremely unlikely that the protocol itself would get banned, and if it did it would very likely be unbanned by SCOTUS in short order.

There are a lot of changes that need to be made to this country to get our shit back in order. I just hope that over the next few decades people in power actually (wishful thinking) concentrate on that rather than pissing off the rest of the world.

What about (profile) says:

Everyother media

Publishing industry to Xerox: But you know people copy books on your machines! You have to filter copying.

Publishing industry to M$: But you know your operating system helps people copy. You have to filter copying. (Ok, admittedly they are actually trying to do this but it fails miserably)

Publishing industry to Bic: But you know your pens are used to copy our works. You have to filter copying.

Publishing industry to Paper industy: See above

and so on…

Stefano Quintarelli (user link) says:

EU regulations explicitly say that ISPs have no re

http://tinyurl.com/ytn4dh
Articles from 12 to 15

1. Where an information society service is provided that consists of the transmission in a communication network of information provided by a recipient of the service, or the provision of access to a communication network, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information transmitted, on condition that the provider:

(a) does not initiate the transmission;

(b) does not select the receiver of the transmission; and

(c) does not select or modify the information contained in the transmission.

Nobody says:

Lets get really crazy

Using this same thought process, here are some other groups that really need to crack down on criminal activity:

Automotive Industry – People are speeding and not following traffic laws. Fix it!

Guns & Ammunition – Why can’t you make your weapons only work on targets and legal game animals? Your letting people die!

Medicine – How is it you let people overdose on medications, or take other peoples pills? For shame, you are as bad as the gun smiths!

The list is virtually endless…

TheZorch (profile) says:

FCC Won't Allow It.

Recently the FCC issued a statement which pretty much warned other US ISPs from doing this sort of thing while they get set to wrap up their probe of Comcast. Comcast’s sneaky stunt of putting people who support them in FCC meetings and keeping others out has made the FCC a bit upset. We’ll likely see a ban by the FCC on the kinds of activities Comcast is doing before the end of the year. Which means any ISP which is doing the same as Comcast should worry at this point.

mike allen says:

why ireland?

ok they did order that some ISPs give names over but can go the other way at one time there were 100s of pirate stations in Ireland. only they wernt irish courts ruled that the stations could continue why? well the defence (so Im told) was that the transmitter was actually heating the guys home the fact he was playing music to it was imaterial. so i guess was the fact they had no law to stop the stations at the time. the moral is that the Irish courts can go anyway and that no verdict is gauranteed.

Steve says:

WTF?!

Over the air brodcast video tape recordings anyone? TiVo? Video tapes with recordings?

People should get to work on that right away!

NOT!
We live in such a f**ked up world. Maybe if we were to get one person in power that knows what they are doing and what is best, instead of these turds that just do what they think is best for themselves, we would have such a better world. Then that one person should just rule the world. Kind of like the UN, but better. No more world wars. Equal dollers. No more problems with illegal immigrants. And hey, no more screwed up gready money grabbing rulers in Africa! The world would be such a better place. Then we could focus on more important things like space travel, diseases, genetic enginering, and destroying any trace of any a$$h0le record company! YAY!

just my 25 cents

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...