Yet Another Keyword Advertising Suit… And Yet Another Ruling That Keyword Ads Don't Violate Trademarks

from the please-make-it-stop dept

We’re beginning to get quite sick of companies claiming that having a trademark give them total control over a trademarked phrase. That’s simply not true and never has been true. Yet it shows up all the time in the ever popular lawsuits over keyword advertisements. Over and over again the courts have shown that it’s perfectly fine to use a competitor’s trademarked phrase or name as a keyword to put up a competitive ad. The latest such case highlights an important point. While many of the cases have argued that using a keyword isn’t “use in commerce,” (a key part in determining if a trademark has been violated) this ruling found that it actually was used in commerce… but it still didn’t matter because just because you own a trademark doesn’t mean you can prevent all uses of it. You can only prevent uses that are likely to confuse potential customers over who is actually selling what, or that will dilute your brand. That’s not the case when someone is simply putting up a competitive ad — and it’s nice to see a court recognize that fact.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: ebay

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Yet Another Keyword Advertising Suit… And Yet Another Ruling That Keyword Ads Don't Violate Trademarks”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
2 Comments
fawkes says:

Google adds to the confusion

Google really doesn’t help matters by allowing a trademark holder to block other companies from bidding on the trademarked term. It’s useful for the owner, but confuses the issue as advertisers tend to think a) that it should happen automatically (rather than after a request) and b) that the system applies across all keyword bidding platforms, which it doesn’t.

technofear (profile) says:

Google does not seem to filter their advertisers.
I play a mmo where it is against the EULA / TOS to buy/sell in game items or accounts.

If I run a google search, the paid ads are for sites that illegally sell items. As these sites send massive amounts of in-game spam, I would like to see them restricted.

Hard when google links to them…

As an aside, one of our staff did a goggle search, clicked one of the paid ads, only to get a drive-by download of a nasty trojan.

I think google could be a tad more diligent in whom it makes profit from (advertisers).

I for one will NEVER again click a google paid advert, nor will anyone in my office.

That is the imapct of google’s lack of diligence.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...