by Mike Masnick
Thu, Dec 20th 2007 9:19am
Earlier this year, we wrote about a new website, Avvo, that had created an algorithm to try to "rank" lawyers based on quality. It should come as no surprise, of course, that some lawyers (e.g., the low-ranked ones) weren't particularly pleased with such a system and some of them got together to sue the site as a class action suit -- on behalf of poorly ranked lawyers around the world. While you can certainly understand why lawyers would be upset at such a site, just because you're upset about something doesn't make it illegal. And, just as judges have repeatedly pointed out that things like Google's search rankings are protected free speech as opinions, a judge has dismissed the lawsuit against Avvo, noting that the rankings are merely opinions and that's protected free speech. That's not to say that the judge thinks Avvo is particularly useful. In fact, he points out how ridiculous the rankings are -- but that doesn't mean they're illegal. Chalk one up for free speech online.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Reminder: Fair Use Is A Right -- And Not 'An Exception' Or 'A Defense'
- China To Require Real-Name Registration For Online Services And Bans On Parody Accounts
- Tulsa University Bans Student From Campus For Someone Else's Facebook Posts
- Russia Reaches The Censorship Endgame: Banning VPNs, Tor And Web Proxies
- Lawyer Ranking Site Avvo Sued By Another Upset Lawyer