Latest Chapter Of MercExchange/eBay Lawsuit: eBay Told To Pay $30 Million

from the ain't-over-yet dept

While you may recall the Supreme Court's decision in the MercExchange/eBay case from a year and a half ago, that was really just over one technical point at issue in the case: should a judge automatically issue an injunction to stop the sale of a product if that product is found to be infringing. Thankfully, the Supreme Court recognized that injunctions don't always make sense. However, once that was decided, the rest of the case still had to proceed. Based on the Supreme Court ruling, it was no surprise earlier this summer that the judge denied an injunction against eBay, but this week he did approve a $30 million judgment against the company -- representing the $25 million earlier award, plus another $5 million in interest.

The case isn't over yet, though. eBay has vowed to appeal the ruling. While the Supreme Court ruling on injunctions was an important one in preventing some of the worst abuses of the patent system, this case is still something of a travesty. MercExchange had claimed patents over all different aspects of online auctions, and while some of those patents were tossed out of the case, eBay was still found to infringe for daring to offer a "buy it now" feature on an auction. What no one has yet been able to explain is how the idea of a "buy it now" option on an auction should ever be patentable. It's simply a feature and a natural offering for any auction site to include at some point or another. It wasn't some brilliant idea that deserves a huge monopoly preventing all others from offering such a simple feature. Yet, tragically, with the way our patent system works, that's what has happened.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: buy it now, patents
Companies: ebay, mercexchange


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Alfred E. Neuman, 12 Dec 2007 @ 5:49pm

    Response

    EBay should patent a "Bite Me Now" response to such silliness.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bartman, 12 Dec 2007 @ 5:52pm

    the way our patent system works


    HA!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ajax 4Hire, 12 Dec 2007 @ 5:56pm

    I plan to patent

    by me now!

    A way of authoring information and mundane knowledge that others already know but that I state.

    by me now!(tm)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Adimax, 12 Dec 2007 @ 7:04pm

    Yeah, hopefully with a $30 million dollar price tag for ending up the loser in this, eBay will fight this forever. Thats absurd to patent.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Max Powers, 12 Dec 2007 @ 8:48pm

    So Stupid

    "Buy it now" printed in a little box that takes you straight to the product is the stupidest thing to patent I have ever heard of, though I'm sure there are many more.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Grady, 12 Dec 2007 @ 9:17pm

    Hmmm, isn't $30 million a bit much? Did the lose that much, or possibly of gained that much through this patent?

    And what next? MercExchange suing Blizzard for it's "Buyout" option in its online game World of Warcraft? As ridiculous as this is, they might as well try... Wait, maybe I shouldn't feed them these thoughts....

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Loganscomputer, 12 Dec 2007 @ 11:31pm

    The WoW auction house is next.

    I can see it now, the buy it now price is gone from the WoW auction house and the court fines Blizzard 25 million Gold pieces for daring to put it in there, oh yeah and a level 70 blood elf mage.

    It's only a matter of time!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), 13 Dec 2007 @ 5:38am

    Prior Art?

    Didn't they offer instant buy outs in auctions as far back as the 1600's?
    I am sure it is hardly a new idea.

    On another note, somebody actually trademarked "Brown Chicken Brown Cow" (think generic sleezy porn sound if you tried to put it into words).

    .. I'm not joking about that one.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    PatentMyAss, 13 Dec 2007 @ 10:56am

    The World Has Gone Insane

    Its really funny when reading news articles about this case to see the term "technology" used to describe this asinine patent. Exactly what "technology" is involved in displaying a button that lets a buyer buy a product for the price advertised? Here is the price. If you want to buy this product for this price, click here. Wow! This is really Rocket Science. It sure must have taken a Super Genius to invent the "technology" that allows someone to indicate acceptance of an offered price.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.