by Mike Masnick
Wed, Nov 21st 2007 9:47am
Mark Cuban has weighed in on the whole Comcast bittorrent kerfuffle, siding with Comcast, noting that he wants it (and other ISPs) to block P2P traffic because such traffic clogs the last mile and that's inefficient and a problem. This is, unfortunately, the same kind of thinking that the telcos love: that the internet is somehow running out of bandwidth, and the more controls that are put on it, the better. However, that's static thinking. It assumes a steady state, or, at best, linear growth of innovation and change. Unfortunately, that's not how innovation works. The more people push the boundaries, the more demand it creates for better, more efficient solutions, and the more incentive there is to create such solutions. Rather than begging for artificial barriers to be put up, Cuban (and others) should be encouraging such uses. They push the boundaries to the point that people learn where the next big friction point is, and they innovate to get around it. When people are using up last mile bandwidth, all it's doing is creating additional incentives to solve the problems and provide much larger pipes into and out of homes. For a content distributor, such as Cuban is these days, you would think that would be a good thing.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- No, 'App Neutrality' Is Not A Thing
- Mark Cuban Again Illustrates He Has No Idea What Net Neutrality Is Or Why It's Important
- Only A Giant Telco Could Introduce Bandwidth Throttling And Spin It As 'Network Optimization'
- SEC Is A Due Process Nightmare: Searches Emails Without A Warrant, Refuses To Share Exculpatory Evidence
- Verizon Thinks 'The Most Important Concept Of Net Neutrality' Is Giving Verizon More Money