by Mike Masnick
Fri, Sep 28th 2007 6:27pm
Due to the diligent work of a few determined individuals, the US Patent Office (once again) began to look into Amazon's infamous "one-click" patent. New prior art was demonstrated, and in an initial re-examination, the examiner rejected some of the claims in the patents, noting that they appeared to be obvious. Of course, patent appeals processes are long and involved, and after Amazon presented their side to a 3-judge panel, that panel has now ruled that the examiner did not do enough to show why the patent claims were obvious, suggesting that what many of us (including those who are skilled practitioners in the space) think of as obvious, won't be considered obvious. It sort of makes you wonder what it takes for the Patent Office to consider something obvious. Obviously, "obvious" has a different meaning to the US Patent Office than to most of us.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Redaction Failure In FTC/Amazon Decision Inadvertently Allows Public To See Stuff It Should Have Been Able To See Anyway
- DailyDirt: Cheering For Mathletes
- Once Again, Amazon's One-Click Patent Is Found Not To Infringe On Cordance's One-Click Patents
- The 'Other' One-Click Patent Holder Sues Apple, Paypal... And Victoria's Secret
- Canadian Court Says Amazon's One-Click Patent Should Be Allowed