by Mike Masnick
Mon, Sep 10th 2007 11:42am
Recently, we've seen the courts getting less and less willing to accept the RIAA's flimsy evidence as being enough to convict someone of breaking the law with file sharing applications. The latest such case is along those lines, as a judge dismissed a case noting that it was just a "boilerplate listing," lacking enough substance to make a case. Specifically, the judge found that: "Plaintiffs have presented no facts that would indicate that this allegation is anything more than speculation. The complaint is simply a boilerplate listing of the elements of copyright infringement without any facts pertaining specifically to the instant Defendant." It's about time that courts realized that the RIAA shouldn't be able to run around accusing all sorts of people without any real evidence.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- European Court To Explore If Linking To Infringing Material Is Infringing
- Apple Trying To Kill Off Spotify's Free Tier; DOJ Now Investigating For Antitrust
- How To Use ‘Intellectual Property’ Properly
- Forget, Mayweather v. Pacquaio: The Big Fight Was Apparently Hollywood v. Periscope Streaming
- Major Record Labels Use Lawsuit Against MP3Skull To Try To Backdoor In SOPA