by Mike Masnick
Thu, Aug 16th 2007 10:03am
Eric Goldman points us to a relatively recent paper by Mark Lemley that takes a look at internet safe harbors for service providers. Lemley agrees with many of us around here that safe harbors make perfect sense, since there's no reason to put the liability on a third party who is simply providing a service, rather than the person actually breaking the law. However, his complaint is that there are different safe harbor rules written into different laws and they have different requirements. For example, copyright safe harbors are a part of the DMCA and require a specific process to receive protection. Safe harbors for libel, however, are in the CDA and work differently than the ones in the DMCA. Since the purpose of both safe harbors is the same, it makes sense, as Lemley suggests, that the various safe harbor rules be put under a single umbrella and harmonized. It's such a reasonable idea it'll probably never happen.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Another Convicted Felon Tries To Use The DMCA Process To Erase DOJ Press Releases About His Criminal Acts
- RIAA Still Pushing Its Bogus Message Of A 'Value Gap' And 'Fair Compensation'
- Universal Studios Misses A Chance To Be Awesome And Instead Tries To DMCA Leak Of Unfinished 'Mummy' Trailer
- DMCA Process Abused To Nuke Post About Researcher Who Faked Data On Federally-Funded Study
- How The DMCA And The CFAA Are Preventing People From Saving Their Soon-To-Be-Broken Pebble Watches