Wall Street Journal Editorial Apparently Clueless Over Copyright

from the let's-try-that-again,-shall-we dept

The Wall Street Journal has some really top notch reporters, but sometimes their editorials get a little out of whack. Tim Lee points out that a Wall Street Journal editorial about Google's relationship to copyright law cites his excellent paper on problems caused by the DMCA. However, they appear to have only looked for a quote they could take out of context and trash, rather than bothering to read the whole paper or, actually taking the time to understand the issues at hand. The entire editorial mixes and matches different situations to try to make their point (that Google is ripping everyone off and deserves to be punished), but if you look at each specific situation, none of them stand up to any scrutiny. Tim Lee points out a few problems with them oddly confusing notice and takedown safe harbor with the ruling that Google can use thumbnails of images -- two totally unrelated issues. The rest of the article trots out a bunch of weak arguments that we've discussed before, that can basically be summarized as jealousy that Google figured out how to make money by making others' content more valuable. They all jump to the conclusion that it's illegal to make any money by making it easy to find other's info, but if that were true, phone book companies, map makers and travel guides would all be equally guilty. The article brushes aside why things like the DMCA provide safe harbor, and why it makes a lot of sense to not blame service providers for the actions of their users. However, it seems that all the editorial writer can see is that Google is making money... and therefore deserves to be sued.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2006 @ 5:40pm

    I think the jealousy point is very insightful. I bet many business laws could be explained from that behavioral point.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Effeminem, Dec 1st, 2006 @ 6:08pm

    Is it just me or are these posts getting more objective and impartial every day?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    thinlizzy151, Dec 1st, 2006 @ 7:48pm

    WSJ Editorial

    IMO if this were some old-line near monopoly company that was making this kind of money doing the same thing then the Journal would have no problem. But seeing as how the guys running Google are not members of the Establishment old-boy network they must be doing something wrongl

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    The i-Team, Dec 4th, 2006 @ 3:37am


    Does anyone have any statistics for the amount of pirated material versus user generated content on sites like youtube? The article makes it seem like these sites do nothing but share copyrighted material, would be interesting to see the true figure...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.