Lawyers Respond To Vonage Stumble With Errors Of Their Own

from the one-good-turn... dept

As the class-action lawyers smell blood at Vonage, one of the points on which the company is vulnerable is its failure to link to its prospectus in its solicitations to customers. This was a minor violation of SEC regulations, though as we noted it would likely set off the lawyers, were the IPO to go bad (which it did). Well, it seems that the lawyers aren't immune to detail mistakes either. When they filed their initial complaint, they alleged that the investment banks received a 17% cut, far more than the usual 7%. They noted in bold that, "Investors were willing to and did pay these large underwriting fees...because investors believed that such fees were being paid, in substantial part, to assure that the underwriters had conducted a thorough analysis of the transaction." Just one problem, the 17% was a typo made by the lawyers -- the banks only got the usual 7%. Fortunately for the law firm, there's nobody to hold their feet to the fire for such a minor mistake.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. identicon
    Jim, Jun 6th, 2006 @ 3:27pm

    Well maybe the banks should sue for the 10% difference. It would serve the bloodsuckers right.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.