Shocker: Nothing Wrong With Doing A Bit Of Historical Research For A Novel

from the congrats-on-the-publicity dept

Back in February, there was a story about two publicity seeking authors who sued Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code for the horrible crime of doing some research for his novel. The pair of authors who were suing had written what was supposedly a non-fiction book (though, the work has been pretty thoroughly debunked), from which Brown took the basis of his plot for the fiction novel. For some reason, they thought this entitled them to payment. If they were really claiming their book was non-fiction, then this is problematic, because you can't copyright "facts." However, it became pretty clear that this was all just a publicity stunt for their book (whose sales have shot way up since the association between the two books was publicized). Either way, it appears that the judge in the case has recognized how pointless this all is and has thrown out the case. Of course, the timing of the case coming so close to the release of the movie based on the novel seems to add weight to the idea it was all a publicity stunt. Nice to know that the court systems are wasting plenty of time and taxpayer money to help boost book sales.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Apr 2006 @ 10:13am

    first

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jdw242, 7 Apr 2006 @ 10:18am

    fines all around

    so, we can fine them for wasting our time keeping up with all the drivel from the 'case'?

    I bill at $150/hour.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ZOMG CENSORED, 7 Apr 2006 @ 11:40am

    At least...

    ...people are reading (poorly written excuses for) books again.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ben, 7 Apr 2006 @ 12:35pm

    I wasn't shocked

    Who was seriously shocked at this outcome?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    JC, 7 Apr 2006 @ 12:47pm

    Not our tax money

    A claim that Dan Brown's bestselling novel The Da Vinci Code copied the ideas of two other authors has gone before London's High Court.

    At least this time it is not my tax dollar.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Bob, 7 Apr 2006 @ 12:55pm

    Huh?

    Mike, you wrote, "Either way, it appears that the judge in the case has recognized how pointless this all is and has thrown out the case."

    But a couple lines later you write, "Nice to know that the court systems are wasting plenty of time and taxpayer money to help boost book sales."

    Are you accusing the author or the court for wasting time and money? You said yourself that the judge saw the pointlessness of the case and threw it out. But then you blame the court in the last sentence.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jamie, 7 Apr 2006 @ 1:12pm

      Re: Huh?

      He isn't "blaming" the court for the wasted time. Haven't you ever heard of sarcasm. He is stating that, yes the court did exactly correct in dissmissing the case, but the case should never have gotten to the court in the first place. So it is quite clear that the court's time and the taxpayers money was wasted on this.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 7 Apr 2006 @ 1:15pm

      Re: Huh?


      Are you accusing the author or the court for wasting time and money? You said yourself that the judge saw the pointlessness of the case and threw it out. But then you blame the court in the last sentence.


      Blaming the authors for bringing the case and wasting the court's money (funded by taxpayers, of course). Sorry if the wording is unclear.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    cntzero, 7 Apr 2006 @ 1:14pm

    heh heh heh... he said "Shocker"..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jeff, 8 Apr 2006 @ 6:26pm

    Also of interest

    Is the fact that both books share the same publisher. Holy Blood is published by Random House under their Dell imprint. While Da Vinci Code is published by Random House under their Doubleday company.

    Makes you wonder who was promoting whom with the movie coming out?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.