Culture

by Carlo Longino




IFC, Comcast Close Movie Release Windows

from the there's-still-a-draft-in-there dept

Independent film studio IFC Entertainment and Comcast have announced a deal where Comcast users will be able to watch IFC movies the day they're released in theaters for $5.99 via the cable company's video-on-demand service. Studios should be aggressively making these deals -- deals that increase consumer choice and let them cast a wider net to catch those consumers (and their dollars) that don't want to conform to their rigid distribution plans, instead of driving them to downloads. Unsurprisingly, it's the independents that are making it happen, while Hollywood's idea of innovation is to release films on DVD and VOD at the same time, months after they've been in the theater, and months after all the advertising and hype is gone. There are a few different things going on here: major Hollywood studios assume that by releasing films to every platform at the same time, they'd be cutting off the incremental revenues they'd get from things like two people buying tickets to a film as opposed to paying the VOD charge once, or people that buy a DVD after paying to watch a movie in the theater. But those fears aren't that reasonable, particularly when weighed against all the opportunities that arise when a film's available across all the different distribution channels at the same time. The idea is to increase the size of the overall pie, not just make futile attempts to protect the size of certain pieces.

The second factor is the theaters themselves, which have been pretty vocal in their opposition to simultaneous releases. At this point, theaters' only competitive metric is the measure of exclusivity that windowed releases provide, and removing that would force them to confront the reality that many people find going to the movies an increasingly unpleasant experience. Currently, the only alternative for people that want to see first-run movies but don't want to go to the theater are downloads or other illegal means. The simultaneuous release of films across platforms would let people that want to see new movies, but don't want to go to theaters, make legitimate purchases -- which is a good thing, last time we checked. Forcing theaters to improve their offering would benefit the entire industry. Just look to China -- where piracy runs rampant -- for proof. The movie business is currently founded on exclusionary tactics that keep people (and their spending) out unless they conform to its rigid structure. People that want other alternatives, and are willing to pay, aren't left with any choices other than to turn to illegal means. But doing away with release windows, encouraging competition among different distribution platforms, and introducing other inclusionary measures that allow for more consumer choice stands to benefit everyone in the value chain.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Cody H, 28 Feb 2006 @ 1:30pm

    simultaneous release of movies at theaters and on

    the only thing left is for the cable companies to figure out a way to charge you 50 dollars for a tub of popcorn and a drink while watching the movie at home now and they will be just like the theater!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sean, 28 Feb 2006 @ 1:52pm

    Different situations

    I am in a difficult situation when it comes to going to the theaters to watch a movie. I have a disabled daughter that will not sit through a movie. She will make so much noise if we take her with us that we would be asked to leave or one of us take her out and the other misses the movie. She is VERY difficult to handle and we have burnt through a number of different sitters so that is not an option.

    The only chance we get to see a movie in the theaters is if we go to an early show on one of my Fridays that I have off (I get every other one off).

    I for one would definitely purchase a movie on VOD/DVD if it was one that I would enjoy. In fact I would be more likely to watch more movies if available through these mediums at the same time as theaters.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Rikko, 28 Feb 2006 @ 3:14pm

      Re: Different situations

      Sean, if it makes you feel any better, the "experience" you're missing out on is getting more "magical" with every year that passes.
      I used to (and still can) get free movie passes from friends who work in theaters.. I basically never go anymore because it's not worth all the fuss and irritation.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        o0otoxic, 28 Feb 2006 @ 3:21pm

        Re: Different situations

        pepole have been doing this usein usenet for years ie 1 computer 1 usenet account never goin to the movies again priceless

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Don Hansen, 28 Feb 2006 @ 1:52pm

    No Subject Given

    I applaud IFC and Comcast for this bold move. It's a great move, now to jsut get everyone else on board.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2006 @ 5:03pm

    No Subject Given

    And I can get these pay-per-view movies ONLY if I upgrade to digital cable for an additional $40 per month (without any premium channels). At $10/theater ticket, that's over 40 IFC films a year. I doubt that IFC produces a quarter of that number.

    When will Comcast figure out that the only way there are getting another fucking dime out of me is to GIVE me digital cable and then provide really interesting pay-per-view content, not by charging for access AND content. MORONS!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    randomboy, 1 Mar 2006 @ 7:16am

    I hope this happens

    I really hope that the movie companies will see that this is a good thing and that they will start simultaneously releasing their movies on multiple media. This way the dvdrip will be available at the same time as the screener on eMule!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Guard, 17 Jul 2006 @ 10:34am

    I'm pretty much able to go to the theatre free as well if i wanted to, yet for around a year I never went to the theatre, because of the hassle, the risks you run if you get a bad crowd, and how unpleasant the experience can be.

    Right now, I go to the theatre for movies sometimes, but I go and pay at a different one just because the seats are more comfortable (but can still be uncomfortable at times...). So for me, its something as little as a comfortable seat thats making me willing to pay the $7-8 a ticket... and even thats something rare to find in a theatre.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ayesandar, 25 Jan 2008 @ 1:32am

    good

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.