HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

Why There's Still Some Good News In Google's Perfect 10 Loss

from the balancing-out-the-details dept

Yesterday we wrote about a judge's injunction against Google -- which we thought was odd, given that Google didn't appear to actually be doing anything illegal. They were simply profiting off of others doing something illegal -- and therefore, the focus should have been on the others. Over at the EFF, Fred von Lohmann has gone through the decision in more details and pulled out a number of good points that were not covered by most of the press coverage. Included in the decision was the fact that thumbnails, by themselves, are not infringing -- and that Google is not responsible for "creating an audience." Both are reasonable findings, consistent with previous rulings. The court also knocked off the completely out of left field assertion that simply visiting a website that has infringing material makes the visitor an infringer. All that said, there's still an injunction coming down -- and the reasoning behind that seems problematic, especially given all of the points above. The fact that some of the pages with these photos also contain AdSense seems completely unrelated to the search aspect. Also, it seems unfair to blame the advertising network for the content on certain pages. That's like saying the ad firm that places a magazine ad should be liable for a defamation charge if an ad it places appears in a newspaper across from a defamatory article.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Stoned4Life (profile), 22 Feb 2006 @ 5:45pm

    adSense

    Google Adsense also has a policy against using advertisements on websites involved in illegal activities. Seeing that they haven't even enforced their own rules, although they may have now, does put Google in an awkward position. The guidelines do assume that google monitors sites for illegal content, does it not? Otherwise, how do they know you're going against their policy?

    That being said, could they have noticed, and not done anything against it if they were in fact making money from the website?

    Those are a lot of ifs, but don't get me wrong. I think it's obvious that no matter what, something needs to be done against the site infringing the copyright.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Xanius, 22 Feb 2006 @ 6:08pm

      Re: adSense

      well, not only is there a rule against illegal activites, there's one against posting the ads on a site with images,mp3,video,or any potential copyrighted material....

      also taken from the adsense policy under material that isn't allowed.
      Pornography, adult, or mature content

      so it should have been disallowed in the first place.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Feb 2006 @ 6:09pm

    No Subject Given

    I think the logic, flawed or not is "Why should Google profit because of someone else's copyright violation?"

    If it isn't legally wrong, it sure stretches some moral boundaries. It could even be considered a little evil...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 22 Feb 2006 @ 7:11pm

      Re: No Subject Given

      I think the logic, flawed or not is "Why should Google profit because of someone else's copyright violation?"

      That's irrelevant. Google isn't doing the copyright violation. There's no laws against profiting as far as I know.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Fred, 22 Feb 2006 @ 9:02pm

    You miss the point

    The judge ruled that the presence of AdSense content on the infringing pages created a financial interest on the part of Google to drive searches to those pages. In addition the judge ruled that, since the magazine held copyright on the same images in the same format and resolution as the ones displayed on the Google pages, then Google itself, not the pages that were linked to via the images, violated their copyright. The fact that the judge allowed Google to participate in determining a remedy is acknowledgement that the determination is not obvious, but it is consistent with current copyright law.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ben, 27 Feb 2006 @ 3:38am

    Google should remove them

    I think that if Perfect 10 wants to whinge about Google image search showing thumbnails of their copyrighted material, Google should consider removing them.... completely.
    If I were Google, I'd completely remove all trace of Perfect 10 from their search indexes, web, images, news, the works.
    They can then watch them come crawling back later when they have run out of traffic.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.