by Mike Masnick

Intel's Ability To Rewrite History

from the wait-a-second... dept

Intel has been seriously overhyping WiMax for a couple of years now. While some have recently recognized that all this hype (for what should be a promising technology in certain areas) is likely to be damaging to the growth of the technology, Intel just can't stop its hype machine. What's scary, though, is how easily reporters are taking the word of Intel as if it were the gospel. This was seen on Friday when Reuters printed what appeared to be an Intel press release on WiMax (bylined by some Reuters reporter) without bothering to do any research about the technology, look for opposing viewpoints or (heaven forbid!) actually question Intel about some of their broad (and highly questionable) claims. Today it gets even worse. While there's plenty of coverage about Intel finally releasing their WiMax chip (a bit late, and there's still no certification process for WiMax equipment), the Reuters article on the matter concludes with a piece of pure fiction concerning Intel's role in developing WiFi: "Intel's support for Wi-Fi in its Centrino brand of notebook computer chips made the short-range wireless technology into a global standard popular in cafes, homes, offices and other public spaces." Um... but, no. That's not what happened. Intel supported a competing standard, called HomeRF -- and despite plenty of Intel hype, everyone went with WiFi instead. Intel only jumped on board after it was abundantly clear that WiFi was a huge success and Intel had backed the wrong horse. Of course, they followed that up by trying to co-opt the buzz around WiFi by suggesting that their "Centrino" chip was the be-all, end-all of WiFi, and now they're trying to bury past overhype by doubling down on WiMax hype. It's really disappointing. WiMax should be a decent technology, but Intel's clear overselling of its capabilities (and time-frames) is only going to damage the technology. If you just read the hype, you're going to think that WiMax delivers a hell of a lot more than it actually does -- and that's just going to lead to a lot of unmet promises and backlash towards the technology. You'd think that a company like Intel would have noticed the same hype to backlash cycle that seems to happen with every wireless technology from 3G to Bluetooth to WAP.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  • identicon
    George, 18 Apr 2006 @ 5:23pm


    ConRoe is a chip that is a mesly excuse for a chip

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Nov 2009 @ 7:35pm

    Please don't delete this you were so right. Intel over hype Wimax. After years of multi billion lost nothing to show for except the bragging right of getting there first with few paid subscribers.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.