We Need A Copyright Enforcement Czar?

from the what-justification? dept

While the bill that passed through Congress took out the worst of the intellectual property law changes, it did apparently allow for the creation of an intellectual property enforcement czar to coordinate efforts by the government to crack down on intellectual property infringement. The problem, of course, is that no one is looking at actually understanding how intellectual property laws are currently structured, where they often do more harm to innovation. Instead of looking at the core issues, they're just tossing up a "czar" to enforce the current (bad) laws. However, considering the efforts by the Justice Department to make intellectual property enforcement a similar issue to drugs and terror, it's no surprise. Both of those areas have a czar too -- and it's likely that any IP czar will be equally as ineffective. Update: Whoops. As pointed out in the comments, I read that article too fast. These were two separate bills being discussed.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    anonymoose, 24 Nov 2004 @ 10:28am

    No Subject Given

    Just to clarify, there are two seperate bills involved here....what was originally called the Intellectual Property Protection Act (which was stripped down of the nonsense) and a $388 billion spending bill which included the czar.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

Introducing the new Techdirt Insider Chat, now hosted on Discord. If you are an Insider with a membership that includes the chat feature and have not yet been invited to join us on Discord, please reach out here.

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.