Passing On Third Party Emails Officially Not Defamation

from the phew dept

Last year, a US Court of Appeals ruled that someone just passing on an email accusing someone else of a crime was not guilty of defamation. While this ruling got plenty of misplaced attention when someone (erroneously) interpreted it to mean bloggers could libel anyone they wanted, it was still an important statement about the liability of third party publishing done online. Now, the US Supreme Court has declined to hear the case, meaning that the Appeals Court ruling stands, and third parties are free of libel or defamation claims for items written by others. While I doubt it will stop people from trying to file lawsuits for third party comments on sites (which we've been threatened with way too many times) at least it gives people a clear ruling they can point to in telling those people to go away.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Doug, 9 Jun 2004 @ 4:46pm

    Not so encompassing

    When you say, "third parties are free of libel or defamation claims for items written by others," that should be qualified by "within the 9th Circuit Court's jurisdiction," which is the states of California, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Montana.

    Because the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, there is no inherent national significance. As noted here, "decisions from other circuits are 'merely persuasive.' "

    A different Circuit Court could come to a different conclusion in the future. This is called a "split in the circuits." If that happens the Supreme Court very well might hear the later case in order to resolve the split.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Doug, 9 Jun 2004 @ 4:51pm

      Re: Not so encompassing

      Err... the 9th Circuit Court's jurisdiction also includes Alaska and Hawaii. I keep forgetting those are states now.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        aNonMooseCowherd, 9 Jun 2004 @ 6:54pm

        Re: Not so encompassing

        Err... the 9th Circuit Court's jurisdiction also includes Alaska and Hawaii. I keep forgetting those are states now.

        That's ok, lots of people don't seem to realize that New Mexico is a state.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Mike (profile), 9 Jun 2004 @ 6:54pm

        Re: Not so encompassing

        Good points. However, the fact that the SC refused to hear the case suggests they're not so upset with the decision. It's true, another circuit court could rule otherwise, but for now, this is the case that stands, and the initial indication is that the SC agrees with it.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          JeffR, 9 Jun 2004 @ 9:30pm

          Re: Not so encompassing

          Actually, the SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) not hearing a case has no judicial weight one way or another.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

Introducing the new Techdirt Insider Chat, now hosted on Discord. If you are an Insider with a membership that includes the chat feature and have not yet been invited to join us on Discord, please reach out here.

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.