Electronic Voting Machine Shown To Mis-Record Votes

from the scary dept

One of the silly arguments of those defening poorly designed electronic voting machines is that there's never been any evidence that they miscount votes. Well, there goes that argument. Found over at Freedom to Tinker is news of some research done on electronic voting machines used in Florida elections that clearly show the machine's voting image and the audit logs do not match, which could lead to votes being lost or not counted properly. What's scary about this is that the report noting these problems was written a year ago and, even those these problems were known, the machines were still used and the same problems occurred again. As always, the local election supervisor claims that, even though they know about this problem, it's no big deal. She claims that the only problem is with the audit system - and not the vote tabulation. Of course, if the audit system doesn't match the vote tabulation there's no way to know that the vote tabulation actually works properly. Even worse, the "workaround" the supervisor came up with was basically to use uncertified software. What's wrong with a paper trail again?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Michael Vilain, 15 May 2004 @ 10:00am

    Florida, AGAIN?

    Hanging and pregnant chads, now electronicallly...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 May 2004 @ 5:57pm

    I may be dense...

    ...but I just don't get all this hoopla surrounding electronic voting mechanisms. I've been in the Point of Sale business for over 20 years, and have designed and installed thousands of systems in countries that require the use of a "fiscal" printer. A fiscal printer is basically a government-mandated (and controlled) device that essentially records every single keystroke made on the POS to ensure that the totals being rung into and by the POS match the paper audit trail. These devices serve as a taxing-audit mechanism mostly. While software bugs to appear, each and every fiscal printer/POS device has to pass rigourous in-country testing to ensure a no-error condition prior to deployment. Thereafter, the machines are audited quarterly to prove that no errors existed.

    Why are voting machines so bloody different? I deploy this kind of tech into thousands of burger joints worldwide for about $2000 per machine....isn't this good enough?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.