The Next Attempt At Micropayments

from the try,-try-again dept

Stop me if you've heard this one before... Suddenly, new micropayment technologies are hot, and everyone is talking about the billions of dollars that could be made by selling content for just a little bit of money. All of these estimates use silly math. They talk about how a large number of little transactions adds up to a large number. That may be true, but it makes a huge, unstated, assumption: that there will be a large number of transactions. Notice that the article linked here never looks at things from the consumer side to see if people actually want to be nickeled and dimed for every piece of content they find online. There may be some places where micropayment fees will work - but it's going to be difficult to make significant money that way. First off, people pay money to get online because they want to access content. If everything is going behind a paid wall, suddenly they feel like they're getting double-billed. Why do they need to pay to get online if there's nothing there? Furthermore, each bit of "paid content" competes with free content. Admittedly, if the blocked off content is very very good or comes with some other advantages, some people will pay for it. However, the vast majority of folks will hunt out a "good enough" substitute that they can find for free. Also, the article completely ignores the important comparison that content providers need to make if they're going to block off content. It talks about the potential to make money off of micropayments, but that's a useless number by itself. The important point is whether or not they can make more from micropayments than they could from offering free content supported by some other business model? I can see plenty of content providers jumping on this bandwagon because they haven't been able to figure out how to properly create an online site that makes money - but they may discover that it doesn't do them very much good. There is some content for which micropayments will work - but it's a very limited set - and most content providers aren't going to think this out before throwing up a paid wall.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    aReader(), 17 Nov 2003 @ 12:48pm

    No Subject Given

    There is some content for which micropayments will work - but it's a very limited set - and most content providers aren't going to think this out before throwing up a paid wall Mike, may be eBegging! Beggars may make a hell lot of money!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ne0phyt3, 17 Nov 2003 @ 1:59pm

    The quality of the content has to speak for itself

    Consumer Reports and Janes are the only two organizations I can think of with enough meat on their bones to get people to pay. But the keys to getting subscribers to pay are
  • desirability -Content that is timely or in constant need. In short, stuff that affects what we do or decisions we have to make.
  • trust - the information they are getting is reliable, which means that the research must be of a very high quality - that takes a lot of $ up front which tends to work against the micropayment model working for smaller organizations.
  • apolitical or at least truthful - the sources can't have any axes to grind.
  • education - the people who drive the market have to have some advance understanding of the value of the content they are purchasing.

    IMHO it seems to me that something is missing from this picture. There has to be a way for smaller organizations to facilitate the exchange of content in a way that guarantees its quality and is beneficial to educated buyers and sophisticated traders alike.

reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ron Helwig, 17 Nov 2003 @ 2:05pm

    Micropayments

    They aren't talking about micropayments, they're talking about minipayments!
    Micropayments are less than a penny, and they might actually have a chance of making money.
    Minipayments are between a dollar and a penny and they have very little chance of making any money since they are far too big to be worth one-time content viewing.
    Let's get our nomenclature right.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Director Mitch, 17 Nov 2003 @ 4:51pm

      Re: Micropayments

      > They talk about how a large number of little< br>> transactions adds up to a large number

      This all reminds me of the scheme in "Office Space" (and all the other movies they referenced) about skimming fractions of a cent off all those bank rounding transactions and putting them in your account to take out at a later date...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    HalfTwitch, 17 Apr 2007 @ 9:51am

    $3.95 a month?

    would the all to common $3.95 a month for access to up to three sites with full access a tried and true example of micropayments?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


    Add Your Comment

    Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



    Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




    Comment Options:

    • Use markdown. Use plain text.
    • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
    • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

    Close

    Add A Reply

    Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



    Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




    Comment Options:

    • Use markdown. Use plain text.
    • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
    • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

  • Follow Techdirt
    Special Affiliate Offer

    Essential Reading
    Techdirt Deals
    Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
    Techdirt Insider Chat

     
    Recent Stories

    Saturday

    13:00 This Week In Techdirt History: April 11th - 17th (3)

    Friday

    19:39 PlayStation Y2K-Like Battery Bug About To Become A Problem As Sony Shuts Down Check In Servers (37)
    15:38 Content Moderation Case Study: Friendster Battles Fakesters (2003) (3)
    13:40 Steven Biss Loses Yet Again; Judges Still Resist Sanctions (9)
    12:12 Released Body Cam Footage Shows Chicago Cop Shoot And Kill An Unarmed 13-Year-Old (74)
    10:45 Republican's 'Big Tech Accountability' Platform Calls For Both More And Less Moderation, And A 'Not Fairness Doctrine' Fairness Doctrine (41)
    10:40 Daily Deal: RelayThat Design App (0)
    09:32 Mastercard Lays Down New Rules For Streaming Sites That Require Them To Review Content Before Publication (43)
    06:25 Wall Street Stock Jocks Are Worried About A Modest Uptick In Broadband Competition (3)

    Thursday

    19:33 Platform Wars Update: Epic Store Losing $330 Million Per Year To Acquire Customers (28)
    More arrow

    This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
    Close

    Email This

    This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.