When Viral Advocacy Fails: TikTok’s Call Flood To Congress Backfires
from the swipe-here-to-call-congress dept
Flooding Congress with phone calls can work wonders to stop bad bills at times. The SOPA blackout 12 years ago was one of the most effective advocacy campaigns in history. Coincidentally, I was at the Capitol that day, and wandering the halls between meetings, hearing phones ringing non-stop was amazing.
However, that process was carefully planned out over weeks, with sites pushing a very clear message of why internet users should call Congress and complain about the terrible copyright laws that were being pushed.
It appears that TikTok may have taken the wrong lesson from all that and assumed that simply flooding Congress with calls is an effective strategy. It can be, but you have to equip callers with a basic understanding of what it is that they’re calling for and why. And maybe it doesn’t make sense to do it on a bill built off the (mostly false) belief that your app is controlling the minds of gullible American voters.
On Thursday, TikTok put up a pop-up on all US users’ screens when they went to get their daily fill of random videos:

“Stop a TikTok shutdown!” it yells, claiming that “Congress is planning a total ban of TikTok. Speak up now — before your government strips 170 million Americans of their Constitutional right to free expression.”
The bill in question is stupid. It’s a fear-mongering (bipartisan) bunch of grandstanding nonsense. It doesn’t technically “ban” TikTok, but would directly require ByteDance to divest its ownership in the company. If ByteDance does not do so, then it is a ban (despite the bill’s sponsors insisting it’s not). It does seem like a pretty clear bill of attainder, targeting a single company, TikTok, out of yet another fear-mongering moral panic that a successful internet company coming out of China must be evil.
As we’ve been saying for years now, if the fear is about the privacy of American users of the platform, Congress could pass a comprehensive privacy bill. They just choose not to do so. Instead, they play up a silly culture war, which will only lead to even more retribution for American apps outside the US. Indeed, expect to see other countries passing similar bills demanding that US companies divest from successful apps in their countries, as a result of this stupid bill.
And, on top of that, the bill is almost certainly a First Amendment violation, as has been found during previous attempts to effectively ban TikTok, none of which have gone well in court.
TikTok’s gambit apparently worked in terms of getting people to call. But it didn’t always effectively get the message out:
TikTok users flooded some congressional offices with dozens of calls. Results were mixed: Some staffers dismissed the callers as uninformed, or as pranksters, or as “teenagers and old people saying they spend their whole day on the app.”
And, look, when you have a bunch of overly anxious politicians who think that TikTok is like Chinese mind control over American brains (it’s not, but that’s what they seem to think), it’s not difficult to see how telling TikTok users to call Congress could drive those politicians to think this is even more evidence of why the bill is needed, especially when there is a flood of calls from unsophisticated constituents talking about how they “spend their whole day on the app.”
And that seems to have been the case.
House Energy and Commerce Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) said if anything, TikTok’s orchestrated calling campaign “only exposed the degree in which TikTok can manipulate and target a message.”
And thus it’s no surprise that the committee voted 50 to 0 to advance the bill:
Lawmakers on the Energy and Commerce Committee, which greenlit the bill Thursday afternoon after months of negotiations, said the intent was not to get rid of TikTok, but to prevent a Chinese company from having access to large troves of American data. The committee voted 50-0 to advance the bill to the full House or Representatives.
Again, it’s a painfully stupid and reactionary bill, but this campaign seemed pretty mistargeted. There was a way in which TikTok could have more effectively leveraged its large user base to talk about the problems and risks of such a bill. But just sending them in to scream at Congress was perhaps not the best approach given the specific animus behind this bill.
Filed Under: advocacy, congress, fear mongering, house energy & commerce committee, privacy, tiktok ban
Companies: tiktok


Comments on “When Viral Advocacy Fails: TikTok’s Call Flood To Congress Backfires”
Screaming at congress only works only works for white, heavily armed shit heels.
How is the GOP not used to this already?
Re:
I am struggling to understand this ‘zinger’. 50-0 means bipartisan support, and the GOP platform is explicitly ban tiktok or force it to divest to a US company who could then be controlled by Social Media content restrictions the rest of the GOP are flooding the courts with.
Like I get GOP = Unsophisticated constituents, I suppose Im not drawing a connection between the bipartisan flood of calls, the 50-0 result, and the idea the GOP mishandled or wasn’t used to the (earned) stereotype of its voters.
Re: Re:
I am more surprised they didn’t simply invade Tiktok’s offices and shot the employees within.
Re: Re: Re:
Ok troll
Re: Re: Re:2
Right? They’re more in the “bomb threat” stage right now.
Re: Re:
“Bipartisan” means Republicans were involved, correct?
Re: Re: Re:
Yes. I don’t get what the GOP ‘ins’t used to’ in this situation. They got their way. I don’t understand the topical punchline on the GOP in this situation.
Re: Re: Re:2
Try it a different way:
Setup: “a flood of calls from unsophisticated voters trying to shut down a resolution helped the GOP pass that resolution”
Punchline: “You’d think the GOP was used to this.”
They are. Thats how they keep winning despite having lower popular support when running on policy. They expect unsophisticated voters to react emotionally.
Its not a joke, its not a punchline. Its structured to dunk on the GOP, but it isn’t a dunk. Its a pat on the back.
Besides the First Amendment nightmare this poses, the bill’s authors have no idea how TikTok would be able to comply with a divestiture. TikTok is too large to be bought by any single company, with a valuation of $80 billion, and the only ones based in the U.S. who could possibly afford it are Meta, Google and Musk, raising antitrust issues; it’s not clear whether a spinoff from ByteDance would suffice (they failed to realize the TikTok unit is incorporated in the U.S., Singapore and the Cayman Islands); and Chinese regulators would stymie any forced divestiture. It also raises competition concerns by eliminating a competitor to the three biggest social media companies, meaning lawmakers would have no right to complain about their market dominance because they enabled Meta, X/Twitter and YouTube/Google to hog market share.
Banning it opens the door to breaking the Internet, giving China and other autocratic countries justification to censor platforms, hurting the same U.S. companies that would benefit. China could also retaliate against our economy, pushing our companies (like Apple and GM) out. It would also risk America falls to fascism by angering young voters to not show up in November, handing the country to Trump and MAGA.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
China doesn’t even allow U.S. platforms to operate there, retard.
Re: Re:
India just straight-up censors anything it wants, in any case.
Or assassinates anyone it thinks is a danger to the state…
Re:
Joke’s on you, China, Russia, and their hostages/vassals are already fucking doing it.
China’s already abusing capitalism to get what it wants and skirting US bans on chip tech, Russia still is able to run cyberwarfare and disinfo attacks despite losing a shooting war in Ukraine, and the rest of the world? Yeah, they’re realizing the American way of doing things only benefit the US and no one else.
Re:
Too bad, Musk was ready to sell Twitter for 250B$, begging some banks to invest another 100B$ to buy it, then promising it would make the new TiXToX a 1T$ company by the end of the year.
This bill will annihilate this hope.
Re:
Gads! I think he’s got it!
It would appear that you have just laid out the right wing’s complete plan of action. I tip my hat your way sir or madame.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Site owner, why do you support confusing and exploiting vulnerable children and young people online by bad actors like the Chinese Communist Party and the gender medicine industry?
Just curious.
Re:
Traitorous shithead,
why do you keep advocating for the abuse of power to fix problems only you yourself hallucinated up while you send childen to meatpacking plants, protect powerful child abusers and bad legislation that companies can’t even follow and obey legally?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Illegal aliens, including children, should be worked to death.
America is for Americans–not guatemaltecos, for example.
Re: Re: Re:
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 ok clown
Re: Re: Re:
Well at least you are honest that you hate human life.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Incorrect.
I hate illegal aliens (and the politicians who encourage and facilitate their entry to the U.S.).
Re: Re: Re:3
Found the xenophobe
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
No, as said many times before, I’m an American Patriot and a Christian supremacist who believes only productive and interesting foreigners (who are preferably well-trained and well-off) should be allowed into the U.S.
Any uninvited migrants caught entering illegally or trying to apply for asylum should be deported immediately, or possibly be sent to work camps.
Re: Re: Re:5
So you’re a nazi, then.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
I prefer crypto-fascist.
And what should really distress you is that I’m not joking.
Re: Re: Re:7
dumbass 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Re: Re: Re:7
it’s funny cuase your so stupid that you revealed yourself and you have no useful argument you already are xenophobic and a nazi pretending to be Christian and thanks for telling us that your a lowlife who shouldn’t be on the internet 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:8
People like you will be rounded-up in the first wave of repression.
Re: Re: Re:9
keep being dumb nazi scum 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Re: Re: Re:9
The .45 caliber holethatwill be where your head was if you try says otherwise, scum.
Re: Re: Re:5
Ok nazi freak
Re: Re: Re:5
So xenophobe and a nazi claiming to be Christian
Re: Re: Re:5
Back in the real world, those two terms are mutually exclusive.
Re: Re: Re:5
One or the other, dipshit. Those two are mutually exclusive positions.
Re: Re: Re:3
Them ferners really scare the shit outta ya hey.
Not ta mention they can stand right in front of ya and call ya a scum-suckin bigot and winey pussy, right to your face, and you can’t punch’em out or shoot’em cuz ya didnt understand a single word of what they said. That’s gotta hurt!
Plan on gettin rid of all things scary are ya? Perhaps you should wait until yer, like, you know, 12 or so, first.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
And by children I also meant American Children.
Those laws you think will protect American children will also affect the very same American children you pretend to want to care for.
Re: Re: Re:2
A hard day’s work [in compliance with any applicable labor laws] never harmed anyone.
Re: Re: Re:3
So…
In Arkansas, they’re forced children to work in conditions adults don’t even dare work in. Mostly migrant children, mind, but OSHA applies to everyone equally. No exceptions.
Your brazen silence on this is astounding, considering that eventually, American children will be forced to work in unsafe conditions.
Again, this happened in Arkansas. In a meatpacking plant. Not as a cashier or a shelf stocker or even a newspaper delivery person, but in a meatpacking plant.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
I’m not sure what your obsession is regarding Arkansas and meat-packing.
I’m vegan, so these concerns you speak of aren’t even manifest in my worldview.
Re: Re: Re:5
You care little for children, yeah – we get it.
Re: Re: Re:
What tribe do you belong to? If you’re not Native, Go back to where you come from.
Re: Re: Re:2
he revealed himself that he’s a xenophobe nazi and even threats me that am gonna get kidnapped in the first repression like bruh how stupid are these trolls
Re: Re: Re:3
Enjoy not living in a concentration camp while you can, Sweetie!
Re: Re: Re:4
keep being a clown troll
Re: Re: Re:4
your proving my point even more that your a dumb fuck who is getting upset that your being called a clown
Re: Re: Re:2
I belong to “the tribe” that kicked the shit out of the “[n]atives” and conquered this country, Baby!! 😀
Re: Re: Re:3
says the loser clown 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Re: Re: Re:4
Nah brah, the clowns are all the hopeless and destitute alcoholic Injuns living on reservations after we crushed their ancestors and destroyed their ways! 😀
Re: Re: Re:5
so yourself then since you are a nazi scum
Re: Re: Re:
You do know that some (if not many) of those ‘Guatalmecos’ were American, right?
Re:
Facts not in evidence.
Re: Re:
And then they proceed to say anyone who isn’t American including children should be worked to death so the troll just out right confessed
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
That’s right–I hate illegal aliens and think they should be shot on site at the border.
Re: Re: Re:2
Dumbass troll 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
Re:
Well for the issue is about following our own laws. Unless you believe that the government should be above the law and constitution?
Secondly the issues against Tiktok have nothing to do with the harm to children, only who is doing the harm.
Third, nothing stops tne “new” tiktok from doing all the same things and then selling that data to China.
Re:
Site owner, why do you support confusing and exploiting vulnerable children and young people online by bad actors like the Chinese Communist Party and the gender medicine industry?*
Dafuck are you asking him for?
Why don’t you ask the parents of those ‘vulnerable exploited children’ who continue to allow access while knowing full well of the risks?
Or better yet, report the parents to CPS since everyone seems to know the ‘extreme risks’ except them…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Mike Masnick gaslighting again
MR. “the first amendment isn’t a balancing test” is gaslighting us again.
No they couldn’t because it would be a content based restriction of speech with no historical analogues.
Carpenter v. US, 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2216 – Supreme Court 2018
Re:
So you agree that republicans and congress are going against the law and constitution anything against Tiktok.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
I think that it violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment, because they are discriminating on the basis of nationality, who can own what companies.
I have not read the text of the bill, and as long as the bill does not reference the content or viewpoint of speech, its probably a content neutral law subject to intermediate scrutiny. However It’s also likely that the content neutral law was written, with the animus of speech made with specific viewpoints friendly to the CCCP so it would probably fail intermediate scrutiny.
Re: Re: Re:
Hey revenge porn enjoyer
Re:
I can’t tell if you’re a liar or a moron. Carpenter v. US was about privacy of historical cell site location information, and whether or not government violated the fourth amendment if they accessed this information without a warrant.
It has fuck all to do with whether or not people have a legitimate expectation of privacy in relation to data that private companies collect.
Do you just expect all of us to take your source at face value and not look it up ourselves?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
You mean like cellphone companies?
Re: Re: Re:
Whoops, fucked up my point.
The point is that your citation has to do with what the government can legally access.
It has nothing to do with controlling what private companies can collect or sell, which is what a privacy law would (hopefully) be meant for.
To put it another way, your citation is irrelevant.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
CCP is evil
An enemy of the US controlling a Social media network is bad, mmm’kay?
If you thought it was bad having the US gov tell FB, Twitter, et al who to censor (which you claim didn’t happen, but it did) was bad (it was, very) just imagine when the CCP decided to do it. Or just “visibility filter” one party over the other.
This really isn’t complicated. Even most of the democratic politicians agree the whole thing is awful, often citing classified info. But sure, tell them all they have no idea what they’re talking about.
Re:
Ok clown
Re:
So you agree you shouldn’t be supporting Republicans’ illegal attempts to control social media as much as you do.
So I guess we’
This immediately made me think of a scene in Animal House:
“He can’t do that to our pledges. Only we can do that to our pledges.”
The Bill is Gaining Momentum
Republicans appear likely to ignore Trump & Biden has said he’ll sign the bill if it passes. So I think there’s a strong chance of this passing.
Re:
Hmmmmm source?
Re:
That’s really bad. He should do a pocket veto.
here me out
or, just maybe, the vote was predetermined prior to them presenting this legislation which is how it was fast tracked. They of course got a chance to lie and mislead people and try to gaslight some people into thinking they voted for the ban because of the angry calls from citizens.
That’s how it’s supposed to work, we call, you listen; dismissing it is just par for the course.
Nothing to do with China or anything.
Congresspeople want to BUY Tiktok for what THEY claim its worth, then see its value ping back up and sell shares.
Thats it. 100%. no care about data or privacy, its just a corrupt attempt to personally profit
I want to sue TikTok cause they said I was 16 years old and I am 46 if they don’t stop I’m gonna talk to Donald Trump and I will also communicate with my lawyer about TikTok. It needs to be fixed. I know Donald Trump so they need to fix, I am not 16 I am 46