Now Spotify Will Offer ‘Car Thing’ Refunds After Public Backlash
from the about-face dept
We recently discussed Spotify’s decision to completely brick the Car Thing products it sold to customers up until very recently. While this was a very niche product without a ton of adoption, Spotify’s decision caught my attention for two reasons. First, the company could have updated the devices it didn’t want to support any longer to open them up to third-party firmware so that these paid-for pieces of hardware had some sort of use other than taking up room at your local landfill, but Spotify is apparently unwilling to do so. Second, the company, at the time, was apparently unwilling to offer any sort of refund to those who bought these devices only to have the seller break them remotely.
In fact, the company told tech publications days ago that the whole point of the Car Thing was to serve as market research for the company as to how people listen to content in their cars. In other words, those who bought the devices were paying for the pleasure of serving as Spotify’s lab rats, which is a horrible look for the company when it decided refunds wouldn’t be a thing. The public backlash was understandably severe.
Which is almost certainly the reason Spotify did an about face and will now be offering refunds to those who bought the devices, though you have to jump through some hoops to get one. And there still seems to be some confusion amongst the Spotify ranks as to what Car Thing buyers will get.
That’s led to some trying to directly complain to Spotify via DMs on X with @SpotifyCares or through various Spotify emails shared on Reddit. By doing so, some users reported that Spotify offered them several months of a Premium subscription to make up for their loss, while others claimed they asked customer service and were told no one was being reimbursed.
Spotify tells TechCrunch that it has more recently instituted a refund process for Car Thing, provided the user has proof of purchase.
The ability to reach customer support was officially communicated to Car Thing users in a second email that went out on Friday of last week after the backlash over Car Thing’s discontinuation had grown. In it, Spotify directs users to the correct customer support link to reach out to the company. The email does not promise any refunds, however, but says users can reach out with questions.
Hopefully the company can get its act together and ensure that the rank and file know what the refund program is. After all, the company has invited buyers to call in for support. It would be a damned shame, though not entirely surprising, if support agents weren’t entirely on the same page as the corporate heads.
But while the backlash likely spurred this change in refund policy for Spotify, that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s out of hot water over all of this.
Spotify’s headaches around Car Thing’s discontinuation are not over yet, despite the newly introduced — if not widely broadcast — refund process. The company is also facing a class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which claims Spotify misled consumers by selling them a soon-to-be obsolete product and then not offering refunds, reports Billboard. The suit was filed on May 28.
Though the troubles around Car Thing won’t affect all of Spotify’s user base, the news comes at a time when users are already upset that they’re being asked to pay more for things they consider core to a music service, like access to lyrics, a feature Spotify recently paywalled. In addition to complaints over Car Thing, users are threatening to quit Spotify over the paid access to lyrics.
Another case of a tech company falling to the enshittification process, it seems. But while that process is unfortunately becoming a recognizable part of the present reality, at least Spotify Car Thing buyers will have access to a refund for the hardware they bought.
Filed Under: bricking, car thing, ownership
Companies: spotify




Comments on “Now Spotify Will Offer ‘Car Thing’ Refunds After Public Backlash”
My “car thing” is a classic cassette deck. I have a reusable tape that actually plugs into the headphone port on my Discman (car-ready with ESP!) It does get a little bothersome lugging around a binder full of CDs, especially when I want to change music while driving… but please do not let this extensive clarification distract you from the fact that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer’s table.
My nephew had purchased 3 after the price drop, so almost $100 for all of them. I sent him the article I saw on Ars Technica about the possible refunds on Thursday, and on Sunday he told me he got the money.
We’ll refund you, but only in store credit, oh and we’ve raised all of the prices in the store.
“credit monitoring” for the you don’t own what you paid for age.
Well, this is why CEO’s get paid so much. Squeeze the golden goose to get the eggs. Worry about the dead goose later.
Re:
CEOs can be replaced with AI
Re: Re:
On a technical level, probably. But having someone literally incapable of human judgment at such a high level will likely lead to disaster for at least one company that tries it, as people figure out how to game the system. People game human CEOs too, but even the dullest ones will recognize when it gets egregious enough.
On a social level, the boards and CEOs tend to be buddies with each other. The CEOs sit on boards of other companies, deciding how much CEOs ought to be paid and who ought to be CEO. So, someone who goes against the status quo will be blowing up their own career. CEO will be one of the last jobs replaced by AI.
Re: Re: Re:
“But having someone literally incapable of human judgment”
At first I thought this was describing the human CEO, it certainly fits.
“the boards and CEOs tend to be buddies with each other. The CEOs sit on boards of other companies, deciding how much CEOs ought to be paid and who ought to be CEO”
A big circle jerk whilst Rome burns.
Re: Re: Re:
You thru human CEOs have human judgement? What on earth gave you that idea?
Re: Re: Re:2
They know when they’re being manipulated because that’s supposed to be their job.
Re: Re: Re:3
If you spent any time around CEOs, you’d realize that’s an incredibly naive understanding. CEOs are incredible suckers.
Re: Re: Re:
Except, it already has many, many times, it’s just that they chose a human sociopath. But, given that the AI wouldn’t be motivated by personal greed, it could still be better.
The rest of your comment is true, but to the average worker the difference between a human and artificial CEO is going to be negligable.
Re: Re:
There was a time I’d have disagreed with you. But, in an age where I’ve seen incompetent CEOs be transferred to companies after killing century old companies in favour of single year gains, and Elon Musk not only being in “charge” of multiple companies while doing nothing visible except shitpost on Twitter, but apparently have people employed to keep him away from engineering decisions… that might be true.
Re:
It’s a supply and demand issue.
You need someone who’s both highly educated and wholly devoid of morals.
Re: Re:
” highly educated ”
CEO? .. lol
These people are not what I would call highly educated, nor would I think they possess a high level of experience in the field or fields the business is involved in. I imagine there are those who are both highly educated and highly experienced but I doubt this is common, that is why they hire experts. CEOs are not experts, unless we are talking about corruption.
“wholly devoid of morals”
I agree with this assessment.
We wanted to shit on all of our customers, because fuckem, but then the public noticed, so now we have to pretend it was all just a big misunderstanding.
-Spotify
Re:
“so now we have to pretend it was all just a big misunderstanding.”
Too late
Re: Re:
Too late? I think you overestimate humans.
We have idiots walking around RIGHT NOW, that would state with confidence that Donnie Two-Scoops never said, “Lock her up”, while watching a supercut of Mango Mussolini literally saying, “lock her up”.
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, you are correct.
If one were to reprogram some Big Mouth Billy Bass talking fish on the wall to say “Lock ‘err up” you could make a lot of money.
Re:
You overestimate the situation here. Most of their customers have never heard of the device, let alone care about it being bricked. For every person affected, there’s probably hundreds of thousands if not millions who will never learn of the situation. That’s why these companies get away with such things – the average consumer will never learn about it, let alone why they should care.
Does anyone else think Spotify is just an incredibly incompetently run organization? I’m hopefully going to kick of a path next year to move away from Google, but I don’t know that I could bring myself to spending money on Spotify.
Timing
Interesting that this comes out on the same day that they announced the second price hike since July. I guess they expect me to pay for their lousy program. Ha! I just canceled my subscription.
The New Normal
Isn’t this how it’s supposed to work?
First, you brick the thing that the customer thought he owned, and you don’t offer refunds.
Then, if there are enough complaints, you reluctantly offer refunds.
Optionally, you make sure that the promised refunds can’t actually be collected by the customer.
4) Profit!