Error 402: Exploring The Little Understood History Of Online Monetization
from the a-historical-exploration dept
I realized recently that I had now passed 30 years on the internet, having obtained my first internet access in August of 1993 — the same year that many consider to be the year that the internet became commercial. That was back when you had to obtain access to the internet, rather than just… having internet access around you at all times. I’ve lived through a decent amount of internet history, and sometimes that makes me forget that other people have not.
For example, I’ve followed most of the trajectory of how people try (sometimes successfully, often not) to make money off of content online. I’m not ashamed to admit that the first time I spent money online was logging into a telnet server to purchase some music, and sharing my credit card in a manner that I can guarantee you was not secure (though, amazingly, nothing bad happened, as credit card scams really didn’t hit the internet in any major way until much later).
However, over the last few months and years, I’ve noticed a pattern of people talking to me about ideas on monetization who seem unaware of many of the things that have come before, including what worked and what absolutely did not. That is not to say, of course, that things that failed in the past will ultimately fail again. The internet is littered with stories of ideas and concepts that failed once when they were too early, but succeeded wildly when the time was right. But, still, it’s important to understand why things failed if you’re hoping to do it correctly this time.
So, this new series (which was conceived of over a year ago, but is finally getting started now) is going to explore the past, present and (hopefully?) future of monetization online, looking at how people on the internet have made money — and how they’ve failed to make money over the past three decades.
My hope is that in going through this history and examining the different elements of what works, it will help many creators and entrepreneurs better think through strategies themselves for how to make money online, how to provide services for helping others make money online, and how to best support the online creators whose work you most appreciate. Hopefully, this new series may inspire others to come up with better ways that help enable more creators to be able to keep creating online in a manner that works for everyone.
Nothing about this series is designed to present the “right” way of doing things. In fact, much of it is about situational differences that explore why some concepts work for some users at some times in some places, and others don’t. But it is designed to explore the various ideas and concepts, and how the idea of monetization itself online has changed over time as the technology and culture have changed.
The plan is to drop a new article in this series each week for a few months. While we have a full outline planned, along with a few initial articles, I fully expect that we’ll hear from people and learn something new as we go as well, leading me to add in new stories and new articles, beyond the initial outline.
As for the name of the series — Error 402 — that comes from one of the initial list of HTTP errors that were created in the early days of the World Wide Web, Error 402: Payment Required. You’re probably already familiar with Error 404: Not Found, and maybe even Error 403: Forbidden, but almost no one I know is aware of Error 402. And, that’s mainly because it was never implemented.
The early developers of the web came up with this list of errors, including 402, contemplating that monetization would be built in to the web as a core bit of functionality. And then… they didn’t. Things got pretty busy and pretty crazy pretty fast. And money was flying all over the place, and somehow… the core concept of monetization got left behind for everyone to just figure out.
So, let’s dig in and figure it out.
Oh, and I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention in a series on monetization that Techdirt has been in existence for over 25 years, in part, because some of you help to pay to keep the lights on here. And there are many different ways that you can help to keep us going in the future (many of which may make appearances later in this series). And, on that note, I also need to thank the wonderful folks at the Interledger Foundation and Grant for the Web for the initial funding to put together this series, as they’re trying to better think through what the future of web monetization looks like as well.
Filed Under: history, monetization, the internet




Comments on “Error 402: Exploring The Little Understood History Of Online Monetization”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Why are y’all still accepting climate-killing Shitcoin as payment on the store?
What the Internet lacks is an easy way of tossing a few coins into someones hat. Such a mechanism has to be almost friction less, and preferably supported by banks and credit card companies, to minimize all associated fees.
Re:
We now have FedNow, which should satisfy most of the requirements except for the one about “works for any business that isn’t expressly illegal”. The GOP will want FedNow to work only for things they think should be legal and fail for everything else, and that won’t make for a widely-accepted method.
Re: Re:
I presume FedNow is some US thing?
Other countries have had e-transfers for quite some time; all you need is an email address. And before that, there was PayPal.
Re: Re:
Ideally also peer-to-peer so moralizing CC companies can’t cut off those it doesn’t like and anonymous so peeping Toms can’t monetize our data.
Re: AML
Unfortunately the source of that friction is Anti Money Laundering measures. While it would be convenient to live in that world where it exists, people are rightfully very reluctant to part with that tool against organized crime.
That said it would be interesting to see the impact of an alternate universe without AMLs to see just how worth it a radical change like that would prove to be.
I remember the Dot Bomb.
Nice walk down memory lane, Mike!
I first got access to the Internet in 1990, and you made me reflect on when I first paid any money for anything received via the Internet. And that made me realize that my first monetary transaction that was Internet related (other than paying to access it) was my first sale on eBay, sometime around 2003.
So somehow I went 13 years using the Internet without money coming into the picture at all. And now I realize that likely really frames what I expect the Internet to be.
By 2003, I was already using content filters on my web browsers and mail clients and had a hosts file with swathes of the internet routed to null. Every once in a while I stumble on what other people view as “the Internet” … and cringe.
Interestingly, I’ve always felt that the Internet cannot survive without payment; but I’ve generally tried to pay with content and support rather than with money. Payment over the Internet for me is generally the same as payment for any other good or service, but over the Internet. The costs of the “Internet” portion get absorbed in the same way brick and mortar costs get absorbed in the sale of objects, or in the way credit card purchase costs get absorbed in the purchase of objects. I’ve never seen a good reason why the Internet has to be any different. Sure, it CAN be monetized in an infinite number of other ways, but it doesn’t HAVE to be for everyone to take advantage of it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
You probably pirate movies and TV and support Hezbollah, right nerd?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You think you would have learned more.
In fact, you’re a pretty constant source of “misinformation” (as the G-men like to say).
Obviously, you should be censored. Oh, hey, at least Bing is on that. Ironically the only thing I like about MS.
Re:
[Projects facts contrary to extensive evidence]
Start with AOL prohibiting people from using their accounts for business (even privately), because they wanted a piece of every part of e-commerce. This drove people to the web, which began to catch up technologically.
People who had merchant accounts had a big edge until Paypal filled that space, just as people who figured out how to code websites. Listservs and e-mails were good as they were beyond the reach of the platforms and couldn’t be taken down so easily.
A lot of people who got in first back then did very well and continue to do well now.
International use?
It would be interesting to see internet monetisation approaches that are and have been tried in other parts of the word. For example, many African countries have much more use of mobile app-based e-transactions than I see in the ‘developed’ world.
This may be scope creep, but I think there may be ideas that are out there that didn’t originate in the US.
(a bit of a /s there, but you know what I mean)
Re:
In much of Asian internet, paywalls have QR codes. Services like gCash and Ali. PayNow, and Mobi.
They can scan the qr from the app, list dozens of choices, set up a secure user id and password, all from the cell phone.
Then again, mobile pay is just about the most common way to pay in urban areas in these countries.
Re: Re:
This is exactly the kind of differences I’m talking about. Thanks LostInLoDOS.
Re: Re:
…why? If a person is already viewing hypertext, it’d be easier to follow an actual link than take a screenshot, feed it to a QR decoder, and open the resulting URL.
Re: Re: Re:
You have an app on your phone that scans the QR-code and then gives you a choice of payment processor. If you access the site from your phone, the site can ask your phone to open the app and list the payment processors.
There’s no need to take screenshots.
Re: Re: Re:
Cell phone ownership across the Pacific is in the upper 80% area. Higher in Asia as a whole. But computer ownership still is rather low. It’s just the history of technology there.
Much of Asia has mobile pay, but very little of it has NFC/Tap-to-pay. Outside of larger cities, I find even using a physical credit card is often not an option. But everyone takes mobile pay.
Hop on to any average PH, SG, JP, CH, VN, etc site and mobile pay is offered for payments.
The process is quite simple. And often as fast as the embedded Android/samsung/Apple Pay we westerners use.
Scan the QR code on your phone (often you have wallet choices with individual QR codes), click accept for the amount (or enter it), and show or type the 4-8 digit code.
It’s so commonplace I ended up getting two low cost limited minutes cell plans (eSIM) to set up accounts myself. Everyone takes Ali etc. from shopping online to buying veggies on the side of the road.
Re: Re: Re:2
I should say, local cell plans. None of these apps take a U.S. or EU number.
I believe the earliest I got into the ‘web’ parts of information was a list the same time. Though I had used BBS systems and school networks earlier.
I have to say with nearly 40 years of some sort of “on-line” I don’t remember ever seeing 402.
Then again, the paywall idea was the most common thing I came across in the early days.
Pay the phone company. Pay the BBS. Pay the OSN. Pay the ISP.
But, no, probably never a 402. I had forgotten the code existed until seeing this.