Australian Teen With Wacky Mullet Sues The Media For Making A Meme Out Of His Haircut

from the did-streisand-have-a-mullet dept

We already know how bizarre defamation rules in Australia can be, but apparently even they have some limits down under. A teenager named Ali Ziggi Mosslmani (who goes by “Ziggy”) got a bit of internet fame last year when a photographer, Jeremy Nool, took a picture of him at a birthday party and posted it to his Facebook page. People noticed Ziggy’s somewhat unique mullet haircut, and the picture started to go viral:

As you can see, it has over 10,000 likes, almost 25,000 comments and over 1,500 shares. As these things tend to do, it also inspired people to create new meme images out of it. Here are just a few:

All a bit of internet fun. But, apparently, Ziggy had a bit of trouble taking the joke and went off and sued three Australian media outlets for mocking his haircut. As we’ve seen in other Australian defamation cases, it appears that the claims relied on this concept of “imputations” — as in what the images “impute” about the individual. However, Ziggy and his lawyers basically tried to claim that the imputations of the memed images were basically the end of the world. And the judge didn’t buy it.

Judge Gibson said Mosslmani?s case was ?overpleaded? and appeared to be designed to ?claim as many imputations as possible while simultaneously avoiding a defence of honest opinion or justification?.

The only imputation the judge allowed was that ?the plaintiff is a ridiculous person because he wears a controversial haircut?.

?The plaintiff is entitled to plead an imputation of condition ? namely being a ridiculous person for having such a hairstyle ? as well as an imputation amounting to an act. This imputation is reasonably capable of being conveyed and will go to the jury?.

The imputation that he was ?hideously ugly? was rejected despite the headline saying the complainant had a ?ridiculous haircut? .

I’m still confused as to how an “imputation” that someone “is a ridiculous person because he wears a controversial haircut” could possibly be defamation, but, hey, that’s Australia.

In the meantime, Ziggy will have to pay some of the costs of the media organizations he sued for the overpleading efforts. And the judge has suggested that maybe he should recognize the humor in this and the fact that it’s not all negative:

District Court judge Judith Gibson mulled over the evidence and declared that Mosslmani?s Texas tailgate ?generated a great deal of interest on the internet, most of it humorous.?

In other words, yes, the judge found the memes funny herself. She also noted that all the “likes” on the Facebook post suggested that people liked the image, rather than that they were mocking Ziggy.

?However, the publication goes on to say that the photograph has generated 11,415 comments, 10,000 likes and 1.7m views, which suggests that the hairstyle has its fans and opponents, but is not indicative of ugliness; to the contrary, 10,000 people pressed the ?like? button,? Judge Gibson said.

Meanwhile, this lawsuit and ruling is creating something of a Streisand Effect. Before this, it seemed that the meme was mostly known in Australia, but thanks to the lawsuit, it’s going global. I hadn’t seen it prior to the lawsuit, but now it’s everywhere. And the photographer who took the image, Nool, seems to be having a lot of fun with it. He got to go on an Australian morning TV program and has been happily sharing the meme’d images himself:

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Australian Teen With Wacky Mullet Sues The Media For Making A Meme Out Of His Haircut”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
G Thompson (profile) says:

Guys you haven’t seen the funniest thing yet..

The case itself has resulted in one of the greatest Australian legal documents EVER!

for example [at 5]

(iv) That the plaintiff, by reason of his mullet hairstyle, has justifiably exposed himself to ridicule by the public.
(v) The plaintiff is a joke.
(vi) The plaintiff is a ridiculous person.
(vii) The plaintiff is hideously ugly.
(viii) The plaintiff is a ridiculous person because he wears a silly haircut.


The whole Judgement for your reading pleasure ๐Ÿ™‚

Get off my lawn!! says:

What happens to all of these fragile and easily offended citizens of first-world nations on the day after something real and life-changing happens?
Imagine another world war or some great catastrophe like a modern-day great depression? How will all of these extremely sensitive fragile flowers take care of themselves and their loved ones in the face of real tragedy and deprivation? I think we’ve doomed ourselves as a species as the innate ability to thrive under difficult circumstances has been wiped from our collective DNA.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop ยป

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...