Most of the speedup from Vista to 7 was moving to a non-locking graphics server. It's all in the perception... CPU intensive benchmarks can actually go slightly faster on Vista than on 7 because the graphics device isn't periodically given back control.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/164485/speed_test_windows_7_may_not_be_much_faster_than_vista.html
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/e7/archive/2009/04/25/engineering-windows-7-for-graphics-performance.aspx
But the changes do make for a more responsive, more interactive system that "feels" a lot faster than Vista.
And conversely, an argument for caps is an argument against competition. Right?
WoW uses a Bittorrent style system to deliver patches. Perhaps his friend just ended up as a supernode or whatnot, getting hammered on the bandwidth because the capacity was there?
So... what are the companies doing with the profits they get each year? Why are they running low on capacity, when it's entirely affordable and within their capability to upgrade to deliver what they're selling?
So... what exactly have the ISPs been doing with the money the taxpayers have given them to build out their networks? It's not like the companies have been required to pay for it all themselves.
I'm also noticing that Comcast et. al. are increasing their profits year over year. How does that happen if they're investing at all in their networks? What it seems to me is that they're NOT investing in their product because they have monopolies on the lines, and simply adding data caps so they can preserve the profits without adding additional service because, hey, they don't have to.
Feel free to prove me wrong with citations, though.
If they're so dangerous, why aren't they in jail? Really... creating a class of humanity that's not dangerous enough to keep locked away from everyone else, but is so horribly dangerous that they basically can't be allowed to interact with anyone else... doesn't that sound stupid to anyone else? Because that's what we have now.
Seconded. Unfortunately, the other side is fielding Romney and Santorum, who are moral busybodies that are fans of small government as far as business is concerned, but big government as far as the bedroom is concerned. Which evil do you choose?
This really seems to me like the judge just legalized the bait and switch business model. Or is it just me? Get people using a product, then change the terms to be favorable to the company once they're invested in it.
Hmm... I think I have a business proposal to write.
The bundling isn't anticompetitive, it's the lack of competition and the amalgamation of businesses from different industries (Comcast+NBC, etc.) that is.
What pisses me off is that due to that control, it means if I want a DVR I need to buy the cable co's POS equipment made by the lowest bidder, build a system that uses the almost useless CableCARD standard (windows only, natch), or only record OTA stuff.
Guess that's why I'm happy with an antenna, BitTorrent and Netflix any more...
I believe the main point of this is that the author's guild is trying to shut down e-books. I completely agree that I like having a number of books in a hard copy. But that should be my choice whether I want a hard copy or an electronic one, depending on my needs and desires. Not the publishers forcing us one way or another. They're in the business of producing content, not telling people how to read that content.
No.
You can be an agnostic atheist, where you don't think there's a god but you can't be sure. Or a gnostic atheist, where you claim to know there's no god. Just like you can be an agnostic theist, where you think there's a god but can't be sure. Or a gnostic theist, where you claim to know there's a god.
Agnostic is not claiming knowledge. Atheism has to do with belief. Seriously... not a hard concept. The dictionary can help you.
I like how you imply that patents are innovation, except that they're not. Patents are tollbooths, and in the software space are VERY rarely used for anything except either rent seeking or protection against that. They don't impart any knowledge, or unveil any mysteries, as is the point of the patent system.
Really... how do you think having every software programmer liable for patent infringement, without them even looking at the patents, is good for innovation?
You don't seem to understand that this is a systemic police state issue, Mike. It's the mindset. They ARE using their "common sense" that they should treat everyone like a terrorist so the real ones don't try anything, and the end goal is to make people scared and compliant. Beat the citizens down and it makes the police's job easier, when they can just do whatever they want whenever they want.
I'm not saying it makes sense. But it's what happens when you have racist thugs going on their gut instinct instead of deferring to logic and facts.
It's called "piracy" and it's already doing it.
BTW, Fox isn't news. It's revisionist spin.
The main thing that pissed me off is that it uses that crap Silverlight streaming. Not terribly compatible with, well, anything. I don't want to install yet another damn plugin for just one thing. Use what I already have, HTML5, Flash. You know... standards.
It's not a magical phrase. They have her on tape saying that there was evidence in that encrypted volume. That's pretty cut and dry.
Arguing about what constitutes probable cause is quite valid. But the fact that it exists shouldn't be an issue.
I take it you're an armchair lawyer, not a real one?
Not really, no. You've gotta prove that to a judge.
Single player games?
Wait... he claims that piracy is leading to the death of single-player games? Is that why Skyrim has been consistently in the top of sales charts for so long? Fastest selling title in Steam history?
Maybe they just need to stop making shitty games and they'd sell more.