Then you'll sit in jail under contempt of court until you remember
I'm not even sure it's indignant. I think they're just scared as hell and don't know what to do.
I dunno... all of the absolutely stupid errors here seem like they're first year student type errors, and the mistakes of someone who's scared and doesn't know what to do so they're just ignoring things and hoping they'll go away.
I don't think it's malicious, but I do think it's a case of Righthaven being in way over their head and not knowing what to do.
Totally going grammar nazi here, but the word is "albeit", not the phrase "all be it"
I do agree, though. Companies seem to have more rights than the average citizen, which is scary.
I wouldn't say "even" in the age of abundance. I'd say "especially" in the age of abundance is quality important. Because that's the only differentiator.
And how is most of it still "their content"? Oh, right... the bought off congress to extend copyright and trademark into areas it never existed before, as well as lengthening the duration.
Funny how that works...
So, if a law exists, it is automatically good and should be followed? Even after the evidence of RAMPANT corruption that controls our political process?
You're saying that people should follow the law. The law that media distribution companies have paid for, so they could maintain their control over the market. Do you not see the problem with that train of thought?
The thing is, it shouldn't have been a problem in the first place, and PayPal is known for pulling stunts like this. They deserve every bit of bad publicity they get. And more.
The problem is the immediate seizure. As I said above... if I complain that I think your car is mine, should the police take it from you right then and there, with no arguments allowed?
So, if I think your car is wrongly held by you, the police should be able to seize it until... whenever? Or should you get the benefit of the doubt?
Seriously... taking people's property should be the LAST thing that happens, not the first.
I've got a solution... don't play the game if it's distasteful. I know I don't.
If you're pissing off enough people that they're shilling to try to shut you up, you're doing something right
So why didn't they say that, instead of blaming "piracy"?
The DMCA certainly includes criminal components, and PIPA and SOPA both enshrine seizure of assets without any judicial oversight, which is generally the kind of thing you do to criminals. Not a hallmark of civil action.
Really... do you have any idea what you're talking about?
It's illegal to sell a device to do the backup for you, but it's legal to do the backup?
The problem is the encryption that they insist on putting on the media. Between the encryption and these new anti-circumvention laws, the industry has created a legal gate completely around personal backups without explicitly outlawing them. Talk about loopholes...
That's copyright law. That's not what we're discussing. We're discussing the DMCA, PIPA and SOPA, which actually outlaw that. Just because it's legal under Copyright to do it doesn't mean it's legal to actually do it.
Grow a clue.
This blog and most commenters aren't against corporations. They're against corporate abuses of the legal system, regulatory capture, and other unfair, unjust and unscrupulous practices.
It's really sad yet enlightening to learn that you can't tell the difference between the two.
So why do you wish to extend US law's reach to China, if you don't want to respect their laws?
Re:
The government ALSO had a conversation in which she admitted the information that was encrypted was related to the case. They have probable cause, which significantly changes the 4th and 5th amendment's scope.
Also note that the judge directed that the prosecution was NOT allowed to use the fact that she decrypted it against her.