Pirate Leigh in the pockets of Big Jaws!
Perhaps someone can explain how this is worse than a RIAA lobbyist becoming a judge.
Funny how those with that attitude never let us know exactly what they produce. They think we should go without, and yet, are completely unwilling to allow us to choose to avoid their work.
No. Why don't you share with us a link to your work? I personally would like to know so I can avoid it in every possible way. I don't want to buy it, download it, stream it, or read it. What's the problem with that? Don't you think I should be able to actively avoid doing business with someone? Or is this what you're truly afraid of--that people will bypass your content completely?
I would prefer they just post a link to their own work.
Online only and not a resident.
Sounds like passive-aggressive "get off my lawn" to me.
Hmmm, budget cuts for RIAA and MPAA?
I disconnected the cable cord from my tv and stopped watching over 2 years ago. Unfortunately, the people I live with still subscribe. Drives me insane to constantly be hearing someone's tv blaring.
This article is about Lendink. What is Lendink doing that is hurting others?
Every time I read a Techdirt article about porn, there are always 69 comments by the time I start reading them. What the heck. ;)
So, would you mind posting a link to your work, bob?
Please, not Lendink all over again.
I hope readers are taking note of the utter disdain authors show at not being able to control every single use of their product. All because copyright law says so, but from the comments above, it seems to be unclear.
Perhaps only the ones who were all "Pirate Mike, y u no debate me!"
Well said. What copyright holders like to believe is that they have a right to dictate to others what content people should have access to. Promoting the progress by being given the legal right to stop someone else from progressing? Nope.
As an individual it is my natural right to decide for myself what knowledge or entertainment I acquire. No one else decides for me and I don't recognize anyone as having the right to do so. I am not breaking into anyone's home or business and taking physical things. I am not hacking/cracking into anyone's computer and lifting the contents of their hard drive. I don't have a device that's able to break into the mind of a creator to "steal" their thoughts and ideas.
Show me an artist who doesn't want me acessing their work in a way most convenient to me, and I'll show you lost potential fan. Not that I'd want to anyway if they belong to a major label, a big six publisher, or simply hate that people can choose not to support them.
I've largely stopped listening to RIAA-label represented music, stopped going to the theater, and read free ebooks made available directly from the writers. And there's still no shortage of content. All without file sharing a single byte. Imagine.
My small handfull of DVDs still have value to me. Extra features, the main reason I ever bought them to begin with. Ah, those were the days. But I'll never again buy a new one. I stopped doing that, as well as going to movies, renting, and no more Netflix. So yeah, they've lost my business.
15? Wow. Congrats. I would sing Happy Birthday, but you know... infringement and all that.
Re:
All it took was one damn online search in order to find a source for the vast majority of my music. Of course, not everything is as easy to find. A person has to get out there and dig for indie gems, but many people just don't want to. That's part of the problem. People have to be told what they're going to like, and they have to be told in such a way that is the most appealing to them. They don't want to have to actively work to find entertainment that isn't from one of the majors. Everything from movie trailers to best seller lists, it's all right there in the consumers' face.