"Google does what's good for Google"
This is the prerogative of every business.
With Google in particular, people can claim they're facilitating piracy but the connection is vague at best. For example, some people liken Google to a transportation service. In the real world, you can't prevent a cab company from delivering someone to a drug dealer's house. It'd be in the best interests of the cab company, however, to avoid doing that, but attempting to discern where a drug dealer lives when the front of his house looks like every other house on the block is almost impossible (Google has also stated that it's difficult to tell if certain content is "unauthorized").
To be honest, this one of my biggest complaints about what Hollywood is doing. They claim Google is helping spur on piracy and it's costing them so much money, yet they expect other companies to lose money/consumers to help them out.
Good point and it seems like most dissenters who comment here are completely comfortable with the weight corporations carry into manipulating law.
But hey, insulting Mike Masnick is way important.
You're missing the bigger picture bob. Speeding tickets and copyright fines were implemented differently. Both act as deterrents, but copyright fines were pushed by corporations.
So tell me, is it okay that an entity, which cares for nothing more than a steady revenue, has the ability to influence law?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iw3G80bplTg
Haha nope, my own little Photoshoop diddy, but I should post it to Reddit.
Apparently AJ doesn't like the whole aspect of free speech here.
You should be happy Bob, this ruling is actually a good thing for artists like Jimmy Page and Robert Plant who are having such a hard time making a dime by copying the "expressions" of others.
Now, they can just repeat it word for word.
I can see why she didn't want some of those images getting out ;)
http://imgur.com/9bZjOmo
Maybe he's trying to hide the lack of citations for his article with a pretentious wall of text and the emotional turmoil of being a hack journalist.
" Like a false rape conviction means we should stop prosecuting rape."
No, but false convictions end up requiring a change in the system. They did this with DNA testing and a lot of people who were initially "guilty" went free.
There's the issue, bob, you have a flawed system that could be improved to avoid targeting false positives.
ha, maybe iv is the way to go but yeah cant drink like use to!
ha, maybe iv is the way to go but yeah cant drink like use to!
But...my stomach can't handle that spicy booze!
I may have to buy one of these...so I stop having to resort to apple juice and whiskey.
It would be hilarious if, as a taunt, they created an Antiguan version of allofmp3.com
"More albums are being made now."
This is one more contributing factor to the decline in sales.
There has been an absolute saturation of music into the market since it's become easier and cheaper to make it. I think that this is problematic because you have a lot of similar sounds out there, but I think it encourages artists to try and be more unique and creative in their approach to music, which could be considered a bad or good thing.
Yes, in the comments there have been, but that's the beauty of opinion.
"piracy is a reality"
What really surprises me about the people who believe that piracy is equivocal to crime, is that they seem to miss the fact that enforcement methods for offline criminal activities do not prevent all crime from occurring.
There should be a system similar to how the DMV handles senior drivers, except it would involve testing senior executives for their aptitude with technology.