People aren't going to go where they feel their voice can;t be heard. These places are losing traffic.
But what do you expect from a growing number of online news outlets that can;t stand hearing people criticize them for their political soapboxing?
You can believe this all you want, but frankly that's all you have, you believe it.
"Is it about sexist attacks on developers too?"
You can't really believe this?
This is a valid point. However Mike there are several sites that have articles that from both sides, provide a fair viewpoint.
I don't always agree with your ass ass, Mike, but you always make valid points despite what Average Joe had to say.
I'm very much pro-gamergate int he scheme of things, and I think you're right. There are lot of outlets that use it as an excuse for clickbait, namely Gawker. Even the movement itself is mired in some ridiculous in-fighting, but I think ethics in journalism need to be a virtue all outlets aspire to.
I also agree and respect the fact that Techdirt does not cover stupid, dramatic subjects just for clicks.
Anyway, just wanted to show my appreciation for your work even if you are a stone cold hard ass.
By the way, I'm surprised you guys haven;t condemned Gawker for this crap, clickbait tends to be there MO.
It sounds like a pretty bitchin' band name.
I do this too. I've seen negative reviews where people rate something with one star over something fairly trivial (it's unrelated to Amazon, but a local gym here in Colorado received a negative review because the guy claimed they would never change the channel from Fox News), and I'm sure thee's plenty of these on Amazon too.
I've seen the bot reviews before, but paid reviewers I think are a whole different kind of monster.
I've even been offered (On Reddit, ironically) to write reviews for $100-$400 a pop on yelp, trip advisor and Google plus after posting in the jobs section for Denver.
For $400, I think most people could create some pretty convincing reviews.
It's every company's prerogative to look out for their own business. I think it's pretty obvious Aereo wouldn't base the foundation of their business on something illegal if it meant the company could get shut down.
That leads me to believe that they were trying to act within the constraints of the law, but it was less risk to their growth to take the route where they're being perceived as "dirty thieves" by the media companies.
Then again, they could have taken the other route and end up collapsing under the weight of the licensing fees.
MIKE! Y YOU NO DEBATE ME!
I'm pretty sure the Nyquil commercials aren't paying her bills.
Half a billion dollars?
I wonder how much of that was hypothetical money...
Sorry, no one can hear you with your head in the sand.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/financials.asp?ticker=P
"pretty penny" huh?
Do your research bob.
After reading this, I could have sworn I could hear the distant sound of David Lowery's butt crying out in pain.
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/06/11/all-aspect-warfare-demo/#comments
Found this on Reddit. I've never seen a game developer so adamant that bugs and crashes are non-existent in a game.
"some evidence of this skewing."
Preferably non anecdotive as well.
Google uses a different type of algorithm compared to Yahoo and Bing to sort the results. If you were smart, you'd know that.
Not a huge deal. They'll pay lip service to the Hollywood jerk offs and do very little to combat the supposed "end of the entertainment industry."