Ugh nevermind that link too.
Bah, stupid academic links
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115919383/Cut-Hollywood-Subsidies
"So the increase from 11000 jobs to 24000 jobs in four years is fiction? I thought you said that all of the crew comes NY or LA, but the guy who owns the soundstage says 75% of the crew is local. And then there's your claim that about how insignificant film tourism is, ignoring the claim from the economic development guy that there was $400 million over the last five years. "
So Georgia is the rule, not the exception?
"Looking at the credits nationwide, a report released in December by the nonprofit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities pointed to a study done for the Massachusetts Legislature in 2009 that concluded film subsidies were costing the state $88,000 a job. A similar study for New York?s film office said government coffers were gaining $2,000 with each job created.
Over all, the center?s report concluded that film subsidies offered ?little bang for the buck.? "
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/business/media/20incentives.html?ref=michaelcieply&_r=0
These subsidies are definitely not the god-send you make them out to be.
And funny enough, the article mentions that because these states are having difficulty balancing their budgets, they pull out of the program, which they think will push Hollywood to make movies out of the United States, thereby destroying any benefit these subsidies provide.
I see your Georgia, and give you New Mexico...
"Gov. Susana Martinez last week'said that New Mexico could save $25 million by cutting the repayment to television and
movie producers to 15% of their expenses within the state from the current 25%. "There are choices we have to make in New Mexico," the governor said Friday.
"Do we subsidize Hollywood or do we
start cutting in the classroom? I prefer to
not be subsidizing Hollywood and make
sure that we fund adequately our classrooms."
Martinez said the assistance program
is often mistakenly characterized as a tax
credit."
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=9dcf78c1-b3e4-4502-958c-ace9ab9a6c17%40sessionmgr4&vid=1&hid=14&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&AN=57844503
Because of the competition between states, this percentage can keep growing and negatively impact other sectors of the state.
Apparently no one pays you to look up the true definition of sociopath either.
Unless, you pay yourself in...you know, pats on the back.
"Watching the foundation crack and crumble is going to be interesting. I hope all the suffering that follows will be worth that rip of Game of Thrones."
What suffering?
Primerose path? What does this article have to do with living the life of luxury?
I just had a Keanu Reeves conspiracy moment:
"What if OOTB is a bot invented to provide a polar opposite view to Techdirt debates"
"The overwhelming consensus is that copyright is "property.""
I've google searched "copyright is property" and I have yet to find a solid answer to this, not to say it isn't there, but I've seen plenty of debate about it as well.
AJ, I'm not a copyright expert, but from what I've read there seems to be a lot of grey area debate when it comes to defining copyright as property.
Wouldn't it be foolish then to jump the gun and say it is property?
How is the content being suppressed or deleted?
Any comment reported to the point of being hidden is still available to read.
You sound like you're just butthurt no one wants to hear you whine.
In to the blue forgot to mention it comes with an optional Dark Helmet mask :P
I wouldn't so much say "grasping at straws" as much as he is just pouting because Mike won't engage him in a battle of egos.
I think this gets worse when you start to think about how our tax dollars have gone to fund cgi abs for Nicolas Cage.
OOTB ego: + 1
OOTB's imaginary representation of Mike Masnick's ego: - 1
The ego of everyone else who reads OOTB's posts: ...the amazing amount of Schadenfreude broke the scale.
This is why I love photoshop
http://cheezburger.com/6792392192
Haha, too true.
It's funny, my brother-in-law is a software engineer who designs medical software for a bunch of hospitals in California.
He told me Microsoft has always piggybacked on the updates other software companies put out for their products.
I'm just saying, from a programming standpoint, sending out a product that hasn't been thoroughly tested is bad for business.
Obviously, accusing your paying customers of piracy is also bad for business, but Hollywood has already set the example that using that assumption is an okay business practice.
I think OOTB missed the part of debate class where you're supposed to make coherent arguments.
Re:
"...people to flock to something that causes such misery routinely."
Like Mesonexian Eeve said above, this could have been instigated by a cadre of knuckle-draggers, which means there's an obvious flaw in FB's business structure especially since this function isn't working as intended.