Is Open Data A Boon Or A Bane?

from the keeping-things-in-perspective dept

Techdirt often writes about the benefits of openness and sharing. One area that is increasingly coming to the fore is open data -- for example, for some time both the US and UK have had major projects aimed at opening up the stores of data held by their respective governments, and other countries are rapidly joining the club. But amidst all the enthusiasm for such projects, it's easy to get swept away, and to accept the idea of open data uncritically. That's what makes this fascinating blog post entitled "Seeing Like a Geek" from Tom Slee so valuable, because he calls out what he sees as a serious problem with open data initiatives:

The point of this post is to draw attention to this open government data doppelgänger -- the shadow of commercial interests that follow civic hackers wherever they go; the new markets that spring up inevitably from the ruins of the old -- and to its dangers. I am suspicious of this doppelgänger: more so than most open data proponents, who tend to use the language of entrepreneurship and innovation when discussing companies who work with open data, and who contrast the new firms with the aging business models they seek to replace, and they often present commercial use as a complement to civic use.
His post gives some examples, such as the rich and powerful property developers using newly-digitized records to evict the poor from lands the latter had lived on for many years. More generally, he sees open data projects undermining traditional knowledge held in the memories of local people. Ultimately, he fears that open data may simply empower the empowered.

It's an important post, because it challenges many of the unacknowledged assumptions about open data and its worth. But as David Eaves points out in an equally insightful post written in response, Slee concentrates unduly on the negative aspects of open data, and omits mention of the problems of closed data:

There is, I would like to note, however no discussion about the cost of closed data -- or the powerful interests that mirror the open data free market doppelgänger's - that like to keep it that way. No acknowledgement for the enormous inequalities embedded in the status quo where government data is controlled by government agents -- and more often than not -- sold to those who can pay for it. I have no doubt that open data will create new winners and losers -- but let's not pretend like the status quo doesn't support many winners and create big losers either. Our starting point is not neutral.
The key point here is not that open data can't be abused by the unscrupulous, but that it is still better overall than what we have had until now, which is an entire system based on the exploitation of information asymmetries. Slee's concern that open data enthusiasts can be somewhat starry-eyed at times is a valid one, but Eaves is surely right that we must look at the broader context in order to understand the true value of openness and sharing.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Ilfar, Jul 13th, 2012 @ 7:42pm

    All on the same page

    With open data, you can be fairly sure everyone is on the same page - you're all working off the same dataset, your ability to interpret it is what's going to make or break you.

    With closed data, you have no idea what information anyone else has that you don't. Your ability to interpret your data is meaningless if someone else has gained access to better data than you.

    With no data, you have your average comments section troll... :3

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2012 @ 2:55am

    Second!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    John C. Tran, Jul 30th, 2012 @ 8:56am

    We couldn't agree more with Eaves As forward-looking organizations and others have adapted to immediate access to information, governments have also been generating more data than ever before. This openness will enable communities to have greater visibility into the workings of their local government and also facilitate community use of the data to build new applications that can benefit everyone.

    This making public of previously private data is what is driving the “Data Economy” and a key driver for what is now being called the Open Data movement. Open Data is fast becoming the next defining theme for businesses as well as governments and other organizations that are looking at the broader context in order to understand the true value of transparency and collaboration.
    We posted on the topic at: http://www.junar.com/data-economy

    John C. Tran
    Senior Marketing Manager
    http://www.junar.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This